UA-18354614-1
Skip to content

Uruguay Part I: Small Country Makes Big, Flavorful Wines

2013 June 18

portion of the Pisano vineyards in Progreso area of Canelones

portion of the Pisano vineyards in Progreso area of Canelones


Background

I have been a fan of the small South American country of Uruguay, located on the Atlantic coast below Brazil and east of Argentina, ever since I spent many weeks there in the mid-80s. That’s when I took a sabbatical from law practice to live and travel in South America for a year.

I rented an apartment in Buenos Aires in 1986 and traveled all around Argentina and South America from there. I kept coming back to Uruguay, though, where the people are welcoming and relaxed, the food is delicious, and the beaches are clean and safe.

Back then, although I loved the food there, Uruguayan wines were, for the most part, plonk. Sold mostly in five-liter demijohns in stores and known as rosé or clarete—in color either medium pink or light to medium red—the vast majority of wine produced in the country was based on high yielding hybrids or lesser varieties like Muscat d’Hambourg. The wines were therefore thin and poor. The best wines in South America then were from Chile, with Argentina also starting to make some good things. You’d have to pay a lot more for Chilean wines, but it was well worth it. There were a couple of exceptions—producers that were making something of better quality from vinifera grapes, like the Carrau family detailed below. They were the hard-to-find rarities, however.

Things began to change for the better for Uruguayan wine production after I left South America in 1987. The formation of Mercosur—the South American Free Trade Zone–at the end of the ’80s meant Uruguayan producers were going to have to become more competitive in their own market against Chilean and Argentine imports. Uruguay transferred governmental oversight of the wine industry in 1988 to a new entity, El Instituto Nacional de Vitivinicultura (INAVI), that was charged with improving the quality of Uruguayan wine and seeking out export markets.

With government subsidies for pulling up hybrids, a lot of the high yielding stuff was taken out and vitis vinifera, the type of grapes required for fine wine, planted in its place. Domestic wines were divided into two categories—Vino de Calidad Preferente (VCP), which had to be made from vinifera grapes, be bottled and have a minimum of 11.5% alcohol. Wines not meeting those basic requirements are referred to as Vino de Mesa, i.e. table wine. Efforts to promote exports, by making appearances at major trade fairs around the world, began in 1989. In 1993, Uruguay became South America’s first country to prohibit the use of other wine region names—like Burgundy, Rioja and Champagne—on domestic wine labels.

British critics who have visited Uruguay in the past few years have reported some very good wines being made there now. I had been following these reports with interest, so was delighted to receive an invite early this year to visit there from Wines of Uruguay, the organization comprised of about 20 of the major producers that leads those wineries’ combined efforts to expand wine exports. On the trip with me, which took place in mid-April, were two other American wine writers, Joe Roberts and W. Blake Gray.

Grape Varieties

Francisco Carrau with experimental Tannat vines

Francisco Carrau with experimental Tannat vines


The grape that has garnered the most attention in Uruguay, becoming the country’s signature grape the way Malbec is for Argentina, is Tannat. This red grape with its high concentrations of tannins and anthocyanins originated in southwest France. It was brought to Uruguay in 1874 from Argentina by Pascal Harriague, a Basque born immigrant. He had visited Concordia in Argentina, where good Bordeaux blend wines were being produced, and brought back a grape called Lorda there. He planted a 200-hectare vineyard with it in Uruguay, and it did remarkably well. Others followed his lead and started planting it, so that the grape came to be known in Uruguay as “Harriague.” In 1919, the grape was identified as the same as the Tannat of Madiran and Irouléguy.

Thanks to the humid conditions, long growing season and clay loam or sandy red soils in much of Uruguay, Tannat gets fully ripe there to an extent it often doesn’t in southwest France. Producers have also worked with consultants on vineyard and winemaking techniques, including micro-oxygenation and barrel aging, aimed at softening Tannat’s big tannins so that the Uruguayan version tends to be drinkable much earlier than its French counterpart.

Tannat can be quite complex on the palate, showing black fruit flavors, like blackberry and black currant. Depending on the oak treatment, the wines can show also chocolate or espresso flavors. I find the best examples to be rich, with lots of structure and complexity. There is often a savory quality to these wines, too, especially with some bottle age.

About one-quarter of the vineyard area in Uruguay is now planted to Tannat. Other red grapes that are widely found there are the Bordeaux grapes: Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot, Cabernet Franc and Malbec. Several winemakers we met with were particularly fans of Merlot. There is also an increasing amount of Syrah being planted.

On the white side, the leading grapes are Chardonnay and Sauvignon Blanc. Winegrowers are also finding that the climate is conducive to Albariño and Viognier.

Geography and Wine Regions

Like the other wine growing Southern Hemisphere countries Argentina, Chile, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand, Uruguay is located between the parallel latitudes 30 and 35 degrees south. The winegrowing regions of Chile and Argentina, however, start about one thousand kilometers to the west, where they are greatly influenced by the Andes mountain range. Uruguay’s climate is primarily influenced by its location along the Rio Plata to the south and the Atlantic Ocean to the east. Its climate is therefore more comparable to that of Bordeaux or New Zealand than it is to its South American neighbors. The climate is typically somewhat warmer and milder than that of Bordeaux, but grapes get ripe at fairly low sugar levels, retaining a lot of natural acidity as they do in New Zealand.

Because the biggest population center of the country has long been Montevideo, where about 50% of Uruguayans live, most of the vineyards were originally planted within about 50 kilometers of this capital city. This area, comprising the political departments of Montevideo and Canelones, still contains about 95% of Uruguay’s vineyards. This is a region with flat, rich, clay loam soils and low rolling hills. It lies within 20 to 30 kilometers of the wide Rio Plata, the waterway that flows from Buenos Aires past Montevideo and on to the Atlantic Ocean. Rainfall is fairly high in this area, as it is generally in Uruguay, but the proximity of the river helps keep temperatures relatively mild.

In recent years, new sites with poorer soils—ideal for low vigor plantings—have more recently been identified farther west toward Argentina, in the north near the Brazilian border, and on rolling hills with good drainage in the east near the resort city of Punta del Este. There are, as yet, however, no officially designated appellations or demarcated wine regions in Uruguay. The references to regions below, then, are to the unofficial ones currently being used, mainly identified by the name of the political division, i.e., department, where the vineyards are located.

Joe, Blake and I spent a total of eight days in Uruguay, following a schedule that had us visiting as many as four producers a day. And although Uruguay is a relatively small country, since the wine regions are becoming quite far flung, we had to drive as much as three and a half hours on a couple of occasions to get to wineries based along the Atlantic Coast, near Punta del Este, and in the west, in the department of Colonia.

In sum, there are hundreds of wine grape growers in Uruguay, mainly small family operations, and approximately 250 wineries. Of those, about 30 to 40 are making higher quality wines, but only about 20 to 25 are in a position to export. The majority of Uruguay’s wine exports currently go to Brazil, but they’re also starting to see significant sales in the U.K., Sweden, Germany, Belgium and the U.S. The several top producers we visited on this trip are making wines that would be in the top echelons anywhere.

In this first of two installments on the top producers of Uruguay we visited, I will focus on the older producers, those that were established by the 1970s, as their stories help illustrate the history of the development of fine wine production in Uruguay. Most of these producers originally made the kind of plonk I described above until the late 1970s or ‘80s, when the industry started revamping and a handful of producers began to aim to make fine wines. In part two of this report, I will profile the best of the newer producers—those that have come into being in the last decade or two, as well as the new regions that are showing very promising results.

Top Longtime Producers

Carrau

pastel painted tanks at old Carrau winery in Colón

pastel painted tanks at old Carrau winery in Colón


Carrau is one of the larger producers of high quality wines in Uruguay. The Carrau family trace their winemaking heritage back to 1752, when the first of nine generations of winemakers purchased vineyards in the family’s former homeland of Catalonia, Spain.

Jumping ahead several generations, Juan Carrau Sust, who had studied oenology at the school of wine in Vilafranca del Penedés, closed down the family winery in Catalonia at the beginning of the financial and political crisis in Spain in 1929. He immigrated to Uruguay where his wife’s family lived and where another branch of the Carrau family had become successful merchants, owning, among other things, a wine and spirits distribution business.

Juan–who had to be one of very few European trained winemakers then living in Uruguay, it there even were any others–was offered the job of winemaker in 1930 at a winery that had been in business since 1898. The company’s operations expanded significantly after Juan came on board and they began exporting wine. Juan was soon offered a partnership in the company and an increasingly large shareholding. In 1932, he produced Uruguay’s first bottle fermented sparkling wine. The next year he published a textbook on winemaking for Uruguayan winemakers. He also took over the editorship of the Uruguayan wine industry’s trade publication. In 1937, he wrote that Tannat was the grape variety best suited for the Uruguayan market, stating, “the best adapted grape is the Harriague, or Tannat, with which, without changing the grape-variety, but rather the ways of treating it, has demonstrated that it can produce unsurpassable wines, appealing to the consumer and without a hint of harshness . . . .”

Unfortunately, Juan suffered a debilitating stroke and paralysis in 1940. His son Juan Carrau Pujol, age 16, suddenly became head of the family and began working at the winery where his father at that point owned a one-third interest. The younger Juan proved himself a successful entrepreneur, starting a couple of new, non-wine related businesses. He also married the daughter of one of Montevideo’s leading Italian families, the Bonomis.

Juan was promoted to managing director of Bodega Santa Rosa, initially taking over his father’s former duties as winemaker, but ultimately spending most of his time continuing to build the financial side of the business. In 1971, at age 48, he resigned from Santa Rosa and sold his interest. He spent a lot of time after that building first one and then another wine business in Brazil, in part because Brazil’s heavy tariffs made it difficult for Uruguayans to export wine there. One of the brands he launched in Brazil, Chateau Lacave, became Brazil’s biggest and best regarded for over 20 years. In the early 1970s, he also worked on behalf of a joint venture partly funded by National Distillers’ vineyard subsidiary Almaden to search for sites in Brazil that would be most suitable for a large vineyard. U.C. Davis Professor Olmo worked with him on this project.

Back in Uruguay, Juan launched Vinos Finos Juan Carrau S.A. in 1976. The family already owned over 20 hectares of vineyards at Las Violetas in Canelones. The previous year Juan had purchased an abandoned winery, formerly the premises of Pablo Varzi, one of the four founding fathers of the Uruguayan wine industry, in Colón. The objective of the new company was to produce only fine wines, made from vinifera grapes, and to sell them only in wine bottles, not five-litre demijohns.

In 1975, Juan sent his son Javier to the Brazilian border to search for 50 hectares of potential vineyard land there. They subsequently bought a total of 342 hectares in the department of Rivera, an area now called Cerro Chapeu for the hat-shaped sandstone hills found there. At Cerro Chapeu, the Carraus planted primarily Chardonnay, Sauvignon Blanc, Pinot Noir, Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot and Tannat.

Vinos Finos J. Carrau was the first to produce reserve wines in small oak barrels instead of giant oak vats. Their first barrel-aged Tannat del Museo was released in 1979, under the brand name Castel Pujol.

Juan Carrau Pujol died in 1984, leaving the wine operations in Brazil and Uruguay to his eight children. Some of them live in Brazil and are involved with the Brazilian wine businesses there. The three children in charge of the family wine business in Uruguay are Javier, Francisco and Margarita. Javier studied agronomy and manages the company. Margarita, the youngest daughter, received her degree in communications and is active in promoting oenotourism nationally in Uruguay. Youngest son Francisco studied microbiology and wine biochemistry, both at the Biological Sciences University of the Republic in Montevideo and in Madrid. He wrote his doctor’s thesis on the microbiology of aromas. He lectures regularly at the University of Montevideo and oversees winemaking for Vinos Finos J. Carrau.

We got to spend time with Francisco at the Carrau winery in southern Uruguay, in the town of Colón near Montevideo. This facility began life in 1887 and was an old warehouse when the Carraus purchased it in 1976. In 1998, the Carrau brothers completed the building of a state of the art gravity flow winery at Cerro Chapeu.

Carrau winemaker Octavio Gioia

Carrau winemaker Octavio Gioia


Francisco toured us through the winery, where the tanks are painted in pastel colors of lavender, yellow, green and turquoise, shades recommended as motivational by a Uruguayan artist they consulted with. Octavio Gioia, who studied oenology at the University of Torino, has been the winemaker at Carrau since 1998. We met him while he was doing battonage on barrels of Petit Manseng. We also saw the individual cubicles set up for 12 people to perform blindtastings every week to monitor how the wines are progressing, and to determine what should go into what blends and bottlings.

Francisco also showed us a small experimental vineyard they planted near the winery in 1995 devoted to the study of different clones of Tannat. The Carraus imported nine clones of Tannat from France, and Francisco recovered four heritage clones of Tannat from 130-year-old vines originally planted by Harriague. They also have the Tannat #1 clone that was brought to California from France in about 1910.

Francisco explained that Tannat has large, roughly textured leaves, and that some clones have tight bunches while others are looser. They are looking for clones and possible mutations with smaller leaves, which would allow them to do less canopy management, and also for loose bunches that are less prone to mildew and rot. While they grow some Tannat on the fertile, clay soils in Las Violetas, Francisco told us that the best soils for Tannat are the low vigor, red sandy soils, with great drainage, that they have in Cerro Chapeu.

From 40 hectares of vines at Las Violetas and another 50 at Cerro Chapeu, they crush about 800 to 900 tons of grapes annually, producing a total of about 800,000 bottles. About 10 to 15% of what they make is white wine; another 30% is rosé, which continues to be very popular in Uruguay. About 55% of their production is red wines. Of that, the single wine they produce in the greatest volume is an unoaked Cabernet Sauvignon for domestic production (about 10,000 cases) and the Tannat Reserve (6-7,000 cases). They export about 40% of their wines.

Carrau bottlings

Carrau bottlings


I counted eight different labels the family is using, not including the joint project Arerunguá they have with Spain’s Freixenet, which the Carraus sell in Uruguay and the U.S., and Freixenet sells in Spain and Europe. The entry level brand is Casa de Varzi, made for the domestic market and Poland. Then there are two ranges of products under the Castel Pujol label. The first is a lower priced line of whites and reds bottled in the rounded Franken bocksbeutel bottle that is popular in Uruguayan restaurants. The Castel Pujol Altos and Robles line is packaged in Bordeaux style bottles, from grapes sourced mainly in Las Violetas.

At a higher quality level are the Juan Carrau bottlings, which are sold for about $10 in the U.S., and which are divided into two ranges: Cepas Nobles (Noble Vines) and Reservas. Then there are the Bodega Carrau Grandes Reservas. These include the 1752 Gran Tradicion J. Carrau Pujol, first produced in 1989. It’s a red blend made from Cerro Chapeu fruit. There is also the Vilasar Nebbiolo, from the very old vines of Nebbiolo and Marzemino that were contained in the vineyard Juan Carrau Sust first planted in Las Violetas. There are also the Sust sparkling wines, and sweet and fortified wines under the Vivent label. The Carraus’ icon wine is the Amat, produced only in great years from the best Tannat grapes in a single plot called Amat at Cerro Chapeu.

We sampled 13 different wines with Francisco. Most impressive of all was an older Tannat, the first bottling from 1989 under the Juan Carrau Castel Pujol del Museo label. It showed that Uruguayan Tannat can mature into something quite complex and delicious, with tertiary flavors of truffle, shitake mushroom and dill, reminiscent of an aged Rioja. Almost equally terrific were two more maturing samples of the Tannat: both the 2001 and 1998 Amat. I was also delighted by the Vilasar Nebbiolo, from vines planted from 1910 to 1912, which is the best Nebbiolo I’ve tasted that was produced outside of Italy. The sweet, port-style Vivent de Tannat provided a delicious end to our meal. The quality level of the wines was very good overall, but these were the standouts for me.

Julia Martinez and Richard at Carrau

Julia Martinez and Richard at Carrau


We also enjoyed our most memorable meal of the whole trip at Carrau. It was prepared by Julia Martinez, who used to supervise the bottling line at Carrau and who is now brought back to prepare lunch when the winery has visitors. She made us the most succulent beef ever from a cap of tri tip slow cooked in Chardonnay.

At the end of our visit, Francisco gifted us with copies of a book written about the Carrau family by British wine writer Christopher Fielden. It is entitled Yet Another Road to Cross: Ten Generations of the Carrau Family in Wine 1752-2012, and it has been a valuable resource for me in learning not only about the Carraus’ long history, as summarized above, but also about the wine history of both Uruguay and Brazil.

Giménez Méndez

Marta Méndez of Giménez  Méndez

Marta Méndez of Giménez Méndez


This is a large producer that was founded in the 1940s by two brothers. The family also had a real estate business that was very successful. In the 1970s they purchased the brands originated by Uruguay’s first winery, Vidiella, which was founded in 1875. In 1975 they created a 100 Años label commemorating the founding of Vidiella.

In 1991, the brothers ended their business relationship and Luis Alberto Giménez bought a winery in Canelones, originally built in 1929, that has the capacity to produce nine million liters per year. They are currently only producing about two million.

Luis Alberto passed away in 1996, but his widow Marta Méndez continues to run the business. She has also served as President of Wines of Uruguay for the past five years. Her sons Luis and Mauro Giménez are both trained as oenologists and responsible for the winemaking.

The family owns about 100 hectares of vineyards, planted to a total of 25 different grape varieties. The primary varieties are Tannat, Malbec and Sauvignon Blanc. Their best Tannat comes from their 60-acre Las Brujas vineyard, originally planted in the 1980s.

We tasted through nine of their wines. They are well made and fairly good, but not yet distinctive. They are priced well for both the domestic and export market. They currently sell about 22% of their production to other countries, especially Sweden.

Their best wine, for me, is the one intended as their icon wine, named for their founder, Luis A. Giménez. It’s a rich, chocolaty, complex Tannat that is aged in French and American oak for two years. I rated it 91 points. It sells for $60 in Uruguay, so don’t expect to see it imported to the U.S. at that price level. What does seem to be selling well for them here are varietal Merlots and Tannats under their Identity label, which retail for about $20. Better than those is the 2011 Las Brujas Tannat, which is rich, savory and balanced. I see one store in New York offering the 2010 version for $16.

Juanicó

Juanicó is, along with Traversa, one of the two largest wine producers in Uruguay. According to Worldwide Export Manager Nicolas Bonino, Juanicó has 28 to 30% of the domestic market share, producing about eight million liters annually. About 2.5 million of that is fine wine, the rest is table wine, sold mainly in tetra paks.

cave built in 1830 at Juanicó

cave built in 1830 at Juanicó


Francisco Juanicó arrived in Uruguay in the 1830s, and built the underground cave—the first such wine cave in the country—which is still in use. It is located six meters below ground, where it stays just below 60 degrees Fahrenheit year round. The winery Juanicó established passed through various hands, including the owners in the 1950s who brought in an Italian designer that created a winery that looks like a UFO landed and got stuck there. In 1979, the Deicas Family, headed by Juan Carlos Deicas, acquired the winery and its vineyards.

The Deicases owned major bus transportation companies in Uruguay and used to run the airport in Punta del Este. They own a huge distribution company for wines and spirits called Almena, which represents famous brands such as Concha y Toro, Norton, Bianchi, Pommery, Taylor’s, Grant Scotch, and Mad Dog energy drink.

On purchasing Juanicó, the Deicas family launched a study of soils and grape cultivation that confirmed that the region shares a lot of similarities with Bordeaux—similar soils and maritime climate, although with temperatures somewhat warmer than Bordeaux. They made frequent trips to France and Italy, and consulted with experts in Australia, Argentina, Chile and the U.S. At the beginning of this year they announced an exclusive consulting relationship in Uruguay with American winemaker Paul Hobbs to act as adviser on their premium range of wines. They currently bottle some of their top Malbec at Paul Hobbs’s winery in Argentina.

During the early ‘80s, the Deicases converted the vineyards to French clones. They own vineyards in six regions in the country, including Canelones and Garzón, a promising new region to the east, near Punta del Este. They have about 310 to 320 hectares of vineyards planted now, including 250 in Canelones and 13 in Garzón. About 70% of the production is red wine, 30% is white.

The winery consists of several historic buildings, and is located about 38 kilometers from Montevideo with its own railroad station and a school for the workers’ children.

Nicolas told us there were a total of three people in their export department, including him. In his view, Uruguay just started making quality wine about 15 years ago, so Chile has a 30-year head start on Uruguay, while Argentina is about 20 years ahead. Juanicó is currently the biggest exporter of Uruguayan wine, with about 15,000 cases going to 26 to 28 countries per year. The four biggest destinations for their exports, amounting to about 70% of the total, are Brazil, the U.S., U.K. and Colombia.

They have two distributors in the U.S.: Ibis in Florida and TasteVino Selections based in Napa, California, which reaches about a dozen states. The principal of the latter distributor, Julio Suarez, had flown to Uruguay from Buenos Aires that morning to meet with us at Juanicó and to taste through a representative sampling of the wines.

In 1992 Juanicó created Uruguay’s first prestige bottling, the Preludio. It is an oak aged blend of five to six red grapes, selected from only the best barrels after two years of aging. An owner of a bottle of that premier vintage of Preludio reportedly recently offered it for sale for $2500.

In 1996 Juanicó launched the Don Pascual brand, in tribute to Pascual Harriague, the man who brought Tannat to Uruguay. That quickly became the leading brand in the domestic market. That same year they adopted the “roble,” meaning oak, term that is widely used in Spain to distinguish their wines that are oak aged. In 1999, they partnered with the Magrez family that owns Château Pape Clement to produce the Gran Casa Magrez in Uruguay for the French market.

Juanicó’s first sparkling wine, using méthode champenoise, was created in 2001. The following year they introduced their first licor de Tannat, a fortified wine based on Tannat. They also bottled the country’s first single varietal Petit Verdot in 2003 and the first bottling of varietal Marselan—the French crossing of Grenache with Cabernet Sauvignon—in 2005.

Their newest icon wine is the Massimo, a modern style Tannat made in large foudres with manual pigeage. The wine spends 24 months in new French oak barrels and an additional two years in bottle before release. It was first produced in 2000 under the name Cru Garage. That changed to Cru Excepcion and finally to Massimo Deicas, in honor of the founder of the Deicas Family, in 2006.

All the grapes are currently handpicked, although Nicolas reported that labor costs are getting more expensive each year. The winery uses three sorting processes for grapes. Grapes considered “A” and “B” quality go into separate bins as they are picked. When they are delivered to the winery, they go onto a vibrating sorting table. The final step involves a group of ladies making one final pass.

Nicolas showed us the bottling room where they package about 2500 bottles per hour. A laser code is printed toward the bottom of bottle lots there containing all details related to those bottles, including the vineyard source and shipping destinations. When any problems are reported regarding a wine, they can trace it via these codes.

Nicolas explained that over 100 cruise ships visit Montevideo or Punta del Este each year, serving Juanicó wines on board. As an add-on excursion, cruise passengers can opt to visit the winery. They have a large, attractive visitor facility that can serve lunch to a hundred-plus tourists at a time.

Juanicó tasting committee including Santiago Deicas left and Fernando Deicas middle

Juanicó tasting committee including Santiago Deicas left and Fernando Deicas middle


During our visit, we looked in on a tasting committee, which included Fernando Deicas and his son Santiago, as well as Adriana Gutierez, the head of a team of eight oenologists. They were sampling through the 2013 Tannats to determine which were the top quality (“AA” lots) and which should go into barriques. They also tasted some prior vintages for comparison.

We sat down in a room adjacent to the old cellar to taste through the wines with Nicolas, Fernando and Santiago Deicas, and Julio Suarez of TasteVino Selections. We sampled 20 wines in all, including one of their table wines and a couple of barrel samples.

The quality is very good at all price points. Julio explained to us how some of the labels and blends came about in response to what they were hearing from potential customers in the U.S. The Pueblo del Sol Tannat, which sells for about $10 in the U.S., was developed for the U.S. market as a lighter bodied, fruitier Tannat, with advice from a group of sommeliers that included Evan Goldstein and Tim Gaiser. It is now their biggest seller in the U.S. and they have started marketing it in Uruguay as well. The pricier Pubelo del Sol Edicion Limitada 30 Barricas Cosecha, which goes for about $27, was also developed for the U.S. market, using micro-oxygenated lots of Tannat that see about 18 months in French and American oak. It is a silky textured, flavorful offering that I rated 91 points.

At my request, we tried a tetra pak Tannat—the non-vintage Santa Teresa—which sells for about $3.50 per liter. It was fresh, good quality table wine—a major step up from the thin plonk I remembered from the ‘80s.

top wines at Juanicó

top wines at Juanicó


Not surprisingly, the most impressive wines in the portfolio for me were the icon wines. The best of these, for me, is the 2008 Massimo, which I rated 94 points. We also sampled three vintages of the Preludio, which were excellent—especially the 1998, which showed how ageworthy this Bordeaux blend can be. It is only made in years in which all five or six of the component grape varieties do well, so they did not make it in 2001, 2003 or 2008. It spends two and a half years in bottle before release, so at least five years total in barrel and bottle before it goes to market.

I also really liked the fortified Licor de Tannat, which is very rich, complex and tasty. I rated the 2008, which sells for about $45, 93 points.

Marichal

At a much smaller production level—currently 100,000 to 120,000 bottles, which they hope to grow to 250,000—is the family owned and run Marichal.

In 1916, Isabelino Marichal, a descendant of immigrants from the Canary Islands, settled in Etchevarría, which is now part of the Las Violetas area in Canelones. He purchased land on which the family planted fruits and vegetables, including grapes. From 1916 to 1938 he and his wife Filomena sold their grapes, mainly Tannat, to local wineries.

In 1938 the Marichals started producing wine. Son Juan Maximo married María Teresa Gallo Tonelli. Together they added to the vineyards and continued the winemaking business. Of their children, Juan Carlos took over the business. In 1975, he married Lidia Santos, who also came from a family of wine grape growers. In the 1980s, the Marichals joined the movement to make improvements in the vineyards and winemaking.

Juan Andrés and Lidia Marichal

Lidia and Juan Andrés Marichal


Juan Carlos and Lidia’s two sons have received an education in oenology and viticulture and together now make the wines. Juan Andrés, the son who also focuses on marketing, studied oenology in Mendoza, and spent five years there, including a stint at Rutini, maker of the Trumpeter brand. His brother Alejandro went to school in Uruguay and serves as viticulturalist. He also spent four months in California working at V. Sattui and Castello di Amorosa in Napa. Together, they decided to focus on high quality wines. They are now selling to seven countries in Europe, Brazil and Mexico, and have new distribution in the U.S. in Minnesota, Texas and California.

The Marichal family now owns 50 hectares and farms an additional 10 that they will eventually own. About 40% of their vines lie close to the winery while the rest are about two kilometers away. We visited the vineyards near the winery, where the shoot positioning on the 15-16 year old Tannat vines was raised with the aim of allowing greater air flow, to ward off rot and other conditions to which they are susceptible in the area’s humid climate. They use cover crops—grass they plant each year—that quickly drains the water. If it’s a drier year, they cut the grass.

They planted Pinot Noir, using two Dijon clones, in 1999. Their first vintage of Pinot Noir was 2002. They also made an unusual blend of Pinot Noir and Tannat that year, and liked the results, so they have continued it. They subsequently planted Merlot, and find that its skin is resistant to fungus, so that it ripens well. They currently sell about 20 to 30% of their grapes to other producers.

The vinification of the Tannat typically includes cold maceration before fermentation for two to three days, to extract color and aroma but not too much tannin. They then start fermentation and separate the juice from the skins.

Marichal Tannat Grand Reserve "A"

Marichal Tannat Grand Reserve “A”


We tasted through 10 of the Marichal wines. It is a good quality line up including a middle range that is quite reasonably priced. My favorite bottling was the 2009 Tannat Grand Reserve “A,” from older vines. It is approachable now, but should age well for 10 to 15 years. I rated it 91+ points. The 2011 Reserve Pinot Noir was also quite good, exhibiting a floral quality. Their unoaked Chardonnay is a good value priced at $12 to $16 in the U.S., and their unusual Pinot Noir/Chardonnay “blanc de noirs” blend is appealing and a strong seller, going for $16 in Minnesota.

Pisano

Dinner with the Pisanos (photo by Gustavo Pisano)

Dinner with the Pisanos (photo by Gustavo Pisano)


This is, for me, the top producer of quality wines in Uruguay. The wines here—a wide ranging collection, from sparkling to dry whites and reds, to botrytised sweet white and fortified port-style wines–are an incredible value given their richness, depth and complexity.

The three Pisano brothers who work together to produce these remarkable wines are Daniel, Eduardo and Gustavo. They are descended from Italians who made wine in the region of Liguria. They date the family’s history in Uruguay to Francesco Pisano’s arrival in 1870. Cesare Secundino Pisano settled in Canelones in 1914 and planted the family’s first vineyards there in 1916. He produced his first wine in 1924.

The vineyards and modest cellars are located near the town of Progreso in Canelones. They farm 15 hectares there where their grandfather first planted and another 15 hectares five kilometers north.

The plantings are rather high density at 5,000 vines per hectare. Daniel Pisano, who is the most fluent in English and who focuses on marketing for the family, explained that the secret for getting ripe tannins in Tannat is low yields. Instead of the Lyra training system, which tends to maximize yield, they use permanent cordon, which allows for more even ripening.

Daniel told us their grandfather had originally planted Italian varieties—Nebbiolo, Sangiovese and Barbera. He found, though, that his neighbors were producing better wine from what they called Harriague. The family’s oldest remaining vines date back to 1942—the last block the grandfather planted. They replanted most of the early plantings in the 1980s and 1990s with virus free clones.

In addition to Tannat, the vineyards contain primarily Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot, along with Chardonnay, Sauvignon Blanc and Gewürztraminer. They also grow small amounts of the Brunello di Montalcino clone of Sangiovese, Moscato Giallo, Syrah from Beaucastel, Pinot Noir and Viognier.

Theirs was the first Uruguayan vineyard certified as IPM, practicing nature friendly integrated pest management.

Daniel explained that their grandfather, who only finished third grade, taught them to “make a little wine, good wine, and sell it for a lot.” The brothers have followed this advice, gradually increasing their winemaking volume by three times while multiplying their income 20-fold, according to Daniel. They make about 25 different wines, some of which are only sold to restaurants in Uruguay. They produce an annual 300,000 to 350,000 bottles, exporting about half of that amount to 45 countries.

Their father was the one who learned how to make sparkling wine and purchased their riddling rack, which was imported from France, from Clos St. Anne.

The latest Pisano to make wine is Eduardo’s son Gabriel, who is making terrific wines under his Viña Progreso label. I will cover those in the second part of this report.

outstanding Pisano wines

outstanding Pisano wines


Daniel and his brothers–Gustavo, who oversees the winemaking, and Eduardo, who is more involved with the viticulture–tasted us through 17 wines followed by a wonderful meal made up mostly of roasted vegetables (since they figured we probably hadn’t been getting much in the way of vegetables given Uruguay’s meat-heavy diet). My scores ranged from a low of 90+ for the Pinot-based Brut Nature sparkling wine, and 91+ points for an inexpensive but delicious Pinot Noir, up to 96 points for their remarkably complex Tannat blend, first created in 2000 in honor of their mother and her Basque heritage, the 2006 ArretXea Grand Reserve. I scored most of their wines from 93 to 95 points.

Many of these great wines are available online in the U.S. through TotalWine & More. That includes the delicious Tannat RPF and Cabernet Sauvignon RPF bottlings I rated 93+ and 93 points respectively, that are priced at only $19. That also includes the wonderful Licor de Tannat EtXeOneko, a fabulously complex and powerful port-style wine, half bottles of which are priced at only $40 (95+ points).

Less available here, but I hope that changes, are the varietal bottling of Petit Verdot—the best Petit Verdot varietal wine I’ve ever sampled, at 95 points—and Syrah Reserva RPF (94+ points). Another amazing wine, made in small quantities, is the Axis Mundi Tannat (95 points). And their late harvest wine based on Viognier and Torrontes, the Fabula, also blew me away for its complexity and balance (94 points). Even their sparkling Tannat, savory and deep, like a Lambrusco on steroids, was a remarkable wine. And their Cabernet Franc/Syrah Rosé is one of my favorite rosés of the year so far. It would be a fabulous pairing with a summer gazpacho.

The Pisanos have proven, beyond a doubt, that truly exceptional wines that would be impressive from any region can be made in Uruguay. And at their current pricing, they definitely over deliver. I look forward to following this family’s efforts for many years to come.

Pizzorno

This is another small family operation, dating their winegrowing origins back to 1910. The first generation was led by Próspero José Pizzorno. They are located in the Canelón Chico area, about 20 kilometers from Montevideo.

Carlos Pizzorno took over in 1983. He started the conversion of their vineyards to French vinifera varieties. They now have 22 hectares of vines. Carlos works with agronomic engineer Nestor Merino and a winemaking consultant from New Zealand, Duncan Killiner, who lives in Mendoza.

Carlos and Ana Pizzorno

Carlos and Ana Pizzorno


Carlos married Ana, a doctor, in 1991. Together they are working hard to market the wines and expand their exports. They have also built a new winery facility. Now they produce four lines of wines—eight entry level bottlings under the Don Próspero label; three sparkling wines, including a sparkling Tannat; reserve wines; and a premium wine they launched in 2004 called Primo. Total annual production is about 130,000 bottles.

I was charmed by this hardworking couple, and the wines are good and well priced. My favorite, at 91 points, was the 2010 Tinto Reserva, a blend of Tannat, Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot that has good balance and some complexity. The Don Próspero Tannat and Reserva Pinot Noir are also good wines. I rated both 89 points and I see the Tannat selling for the bargain price of $11 in New Jersey, according to WineSearcher.com.

Other Longtime Producers

We visited three other producers that have been in business since at least the 1970s, including two of Uruguay’s three biggest producers, along with Juanicó. Those two giants are Traversa and Irurtia.

Grupo Traversa is Uruguay’s biggest producer, by volume, at about 10 to 12 million liters of wine per year—amounting to 12 to 14% of Uruguay’s total production. They export 17 to 18% of their wines. They own about 360 hectares of vineyards, and plant an additional 10 to 15 hectares each year. Those vineyards provide about 50% of their needs; they buy the rest of their grapes under long term contracts. Traversa was the first winery in Uruguay to employ machine harvesting.

The Traversa family first purchased land in 1904 and sold grapes. They founded the winery in 1956 to make table wines. Since 2001, they started reconverting part of the winery to produce fine wines. From what we tasted, though, they still have some distance to go to be considered a fine wine producer. They produce some simple wines at lower price points that are drinkable, but nothing that I can particularly recommend.

vineyards at Irurtia in Colonia

vineyards at Irurtia in Colonia


Irurtia is one of Uruguay’s oldest wineries. They date their first vintage, produced by Basque immigrant Lorenzo Irurtia, back to 1913. Lorenzo introduced grape growing to Uruguay’s Colonia region, near the city of Carmelo. One of his descendants, Dante Irurtia, took over management of the company in 1954. He traveled to Europe in the 1960s and brought back new ideas and European grapes. They claim he was the first in Uruguay to plant Merlot, with cuttings imported from France, in the late ‘60s. He was also the first to use the Lyra vine training system in Uruguay.

Dante’s children run the company today. They own 250 hectares of vineyards—down from 340 some years back, when they began to uproot vines that were no longer productive or desirable varieties. Their annual production is about two million liters, so Irurtia is third in size after Traversa and Juanicó.

We tasted through 11 of their wines, which are of decent quality. The highest scoring wine for me was a Reserva Gewürztraminer at 89 points. They also make a rather good version of Medio y Medio—a sweet, lightly sparkling traditional wine of Uruguay that could compete well with a lot of Moscatos currently on the market. The wines are competitively priced; I just didn’t find any of them very complex or compelling.

The most disappointing of the longtime producers for me was Juan Toscanini & Hijos S.A. They started making what are now known as table wines about 100 years ago, and currently produce about 500,000 bottles annually, of which they export 20%. They own about 90 hectares of vines.

They claim that 50% of their production is now “fine wine.” I found most of the 13 wines we tasted there, however, to be thin and herbaceous, suggesting they make wine largely from very high yielding vines. I see a few of these wines stocked at stores in New York for $9 a bottle. By far the best of what we tasted there was the icon wine created for their 100-year anniversary in 2004. It is a Tannat that spends 18 months in oak called Antologïa. For me, even though there was some substance to this wine, the oak dominated the nose and palate. I rated it 88 points.

For my tasting notes on the wines from each of these producers that we sampled on the trip, see below:

Top Longtime Producers
Carrau

Carrau Tannats

Carrau Tannats

  • 2009 Bodegas Carrau Sust Brut Nature – Uruguay, Rivera, Cerro Chapeu (4/17/2013)
    Light yellow color with abundant tiny bubbles; appealing, chalk, very tart apple, tart pear nose; creamy textured, very tart pear, tart apple palate, like a fine Cava; medium finish (13% alcohol; 18 mos in oak; 4 grams dosage) 90+ points

  • 2011 Bodegas Carrau Chardonnay Juan Carrau de Reserva Bodegas Carrau – Uruguay, Las Violetas (4/17/2013)
    Light yellow color; apple, tart pear, almond nose; rich, tart apple, tart pear, almond oil palate with good acidity; medium-plus finish (13.5% alcohol; 65% barrel fermented) 91+ points

  • 2012 Bodegas Carrau Sauvignon Blanc Sur Lie – Uruguay, Rivera, Cerro Chapeu (4/17/2013)
    Very light yellow color; appealing, very tart peach, tart pear, ripe citrus nose; tasty, tart pear, tart peach, citrus palate; medium finish (13% alcohol; no oak) 90+ points

  • 2010 Bodegas Carrau 1752 Gran Tradicion Petit Manseng Sauvignon Gris – Uruguay, Montevideo (4/17/2013)
    Light medium yellow color; ripe pineapple, fruit cocktail, almond nose; rich, full bodied, lush, tart pineapple, ripe peach palate; medium-plus finish (1.5% residual sugar; 90% Petit Manseng, 10% Sauvignon Gris; 13.5% alcohol; 10 mos in new French oak) 89+ points

  • 2012 Bodegas Carrau Saignée – Uruguay, Las Violetas (4/17/2013)
    Light medium pink color with pale meniscus; intense, tart cranberry, tart blood orange nose; tasty, tart cranberry, tart blood orange, dried cranberry palate with good acidity; medium-plus finish (13% alcohol; no malo) 91+ points

  • 2011 Bodegas Carrau Pinot Noir Reserva – Uruguay, Rivera, Cerro Chapeu (4/17/2013)
    Dark cherry red color with pale meniscus; appealing, tart cherry, ripe cranberry, light sous bois nose; tasty, tart cranberry, very tart cherry, mineral palate with medium acidity; could age nicely for 6-8 years; medium-plus finish (13% alcohol) 90+ points

  • 2010 Bodegas Carrau Tannat Tannat de Reserva – Uruguay, Las Violetas (4/17/2013)
    Very dark ruby color; a little reduction, lightly smoky, roasted plum nose; tasty, fresh, tart red fruit, raspberry, dried berry, tar palate with a saline quality; medium-plus finish (13.5% alcohol; 25% new French and American oak for 14-18 mos; 6 mos in bottle) 90+ points

  • 1998 Bodegas Carrau Tannat Amat – Uruguay, Rivera, Cerro Chapeu (4/17/2013)
    Bricking opaque purple red violet color; dried black fig, clove, anise nose; tasty, mature, dried plum, anise, dried berry palate; medium-plus finish 91 points

  • 2009 Bodegas Carrau 1752 Gran Tradicion – Uruguay, Rivera, Cerro Chapeu (4/17/2013)
    Very dark maroon color; appealing, tart currant, tart plum, loam, tart black currant nose; balanced, tasty, tart plum, tart black currant, dried currant, iodine palate with good acidity; medium-plus finish (14% alcohol; 40% Tannat, 30% Cabernet Sauvignon, 30% Cabernet Franc) 91 points

  • 1989 Juan Carrau Tannat Castel Pujol del Museo – Uruguay, Central (4/17/2013)
    Bricking very dark red violet color; mature, truffle, dried shitake mushroom nose reminiscent of an aged Rioja; tasty, mature, iodine, dill, dried shitake mushroom, anise palate; medium-plus finish (11.5% alcohol) 93+ points

  • 2001 Bodegas Carrau Tannat Amat – Uruguay, Rivera, Cerro Chapeu (4/17/2013)
    Opaque purple red violet color; maturing, iodine, mushroom nose; mature, complex, dried berry, mocha, walnut, dried black mushroom, coffee palate; medium-plus finish (13.5% alcohol; 50% French, 50% American oak for 20 months) 92 points

  • 2004 Bodegas Carrau Nebbiolo Vilasar – Uruguay, Canelones, Las Violetas (4/17/2013)
    Very dark ruby color; ripe cherry, dried cherry, black raspberry, tar nose; varietally true, tar, dried cherry, tart black cherry palate with light salinity and good acidity; medium-plus finish (13.5% alcohol) 92+ points

  • 2007 Bodegas Carrau Vivent de Tannat Limited Edition – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    From 500 ml – very dark ruby color; appealing, rich, dried mulberry, Maraschino cherry, chocolate cherry, dried roses nose; tasty, rich, chocolate cherry, dried cherry palate, port-like but lighter bodied; long finish (18 mos in French oak; 18.5% alcohol) 91+ points

Giménez Méndez

Giménez Méndez wines

Giménez Méndez wines

  • 2013 Giménez Méndez Sauvignon Blanc Alta Reserva – Uruguay, Canelones (4/15/2013)
    Light yellow color; tart peach, ripe citrus, light lime nose; tart grapefruit, citrus, mineral palate with medium acidity; medium-plus finish (11.5% alcohol) 88+ points

  • 2011 Giménez Méndez Sauvignon Blanc 100 anos – Uruguay, Canelones (4/19/2013)
    Light yellow color; grapefruit juice, saline nose; juicy, grapefruit juice, saline palate with medium acidity; medium finish 88+ points

  • 2011 Giménez Méndez Malbec Alta Reserva Las Brujas – Uruguay (4/15/2013)
    Very dark ruby color; oak, mocha, ripe berry nose; tart berry, tart cherry palate with firm tannins and good acidity; medium finish (13% alcohol) 87+ points

  • 2011 Giménez Méndez Cabernet Sauvignon 100 Años Reserva Familiar – Uruguay, Canelones (4/15/2013)
    Very dark red violet color; appealing, lifted, cassis, black currant syrup, vanilla nose; ripe berry, tart black currant palate with good acidity; medium finish (14% alcohol) 87 points

  • 2011 Giménez Méndez Identity – Uruguay, Canelones (4/15/2013)
    Dark ruby color; appealing, ripe black fruit, light espresso, chocolate nose; tart black fruit, espresso palate; short-medium finish (13.5% alcohol; 8-9 mos in American and French oak) 88 points

  • 2010 Giménez Méndez Identity – Uruguay, Canelones (4/15/2013)
    Very dark maroon color; appealing, tart black cherry, dark chocolate, ripe black fruit nose; tart black fruit, tar palate with good acidity; medium-plus finish (8 mos in American and French oak) 88+ points

  • 2011 Giménez Méndez Tannat Las Brujas – Uruguay (4/15/2013)
    Appealing, chocolate, ripe blackberry, light lavender nose; rich, savory, tart black fruit, tar palate with balance and firm tannins; medium-plus finish 90 points

  • 2009 Giménez Méndez Tannat Luis A. Gimenez Super Premium – Uruguay, Canelones (4/15/2013)
    Opaque purple red violet color; savory, oak, ripe black fruit, ripe berry, dark chocolate, licorice nose; complex, tart black fruit, licorice, tar palate; needs 3-plus years to integrate; medium-plus finish (aged for 2 years in French and American oak) 91 points

  • 2011 Giménez Méndez Tannat Syrah Viognier Las Brujas – Uruguay, Canelones (4/15/2013)
    Very dark maroon color; fresh, tart berry, light herb nose; tasty, tart black fruit, herbs palate; could use 1 year; medium-plus finish (45% Tannat, 40% Syrah, 5% Viognier) 88+ points

Juanicó

Juanicó wines

Juanicó wines

  • NV Familia Deicas Castelar Brut Reserve – Uruguay, Canelones, Juanicó (4/18/2013)
    Light yellow color with steady small bubbles; appealing, ripe pear, floral, tart peach nose; tasty, tart pear, very tart peach, mineral palate with medium acidity; medium finish (blend of Chardonnay with 5% Viognier) 87 points

  • 2012 Pueblo Del Sol Chardonnay Reserve – Uruguay, Canelones, Juanicó (4/18/2013)
    Light yellow color; appealing, light hazelnut, tart pear nose; tart pear, tart apple, light hazelnut palate with good acidity; medium finish (13.5% alcohol; 3 mos in 2nd and 3rd use oak) 87+ points

  • 2011 Familia Deicas Familia Deicas Preludio Barrel Select Lote no. 12 – Uruguay, Canelones, Juanicó (4/18/2013)
    Light lemon yellow color; appealing, almond, light hazelnut, baked pear nose; tasty, rich but poised, tart pineapple, tart pear, almond, hazelnut palate with good acidity that should also age nicely; medium-plus finish (90% Chardonnay, 10% Viognier and Sauvignon Gris; 13.5% alcohol) 91+ points

  • 2012 Pueblo Del Sol Pinot Noir – Uruguay, Canelones, Juanicó (4/18/2013)
    Dark cherry red color with pale meniscus; tart strawberry, tart cherry nose; tasty, tart strawberry, tart cherry palate with good acidity and balance; medium-plus finish (good value at $10 in U.S.; 12% alcohol) 87+ points

  • NV Santa Teresa Tannat – Uruguay, Canelones, Juanicó (4/18/2013)
    From 1 liter tetra pak – dark ruby color; fresh, ripe currant, tart red berry nose; tasty, fresh ripe currant, tart red berry palate; medium finish 85+ points

  • 2012 Pueblo Del Sol Tannat Rosé – Uruguay, Canelones, Juanicó (4/18/2013)
    Light medium pink orange color; appealing, tart dried orange, lime nose; tasty, balanced, fleshy, tart orange, tart citrus, chalk and mineral palate with good acidity; medium-plus finish (11% alcohol) 91 points

  • 2012 Familia Deicas Atlantico Sur Reserve Garzon vineyard – Uruguay, Paysandú (4/18/2013)
    Very dark ruby color; appealing, tart berry, licorice, toast nose; ripe red fruit, ripe cherry, ripe raspberry palate with integrating oak; medium-plus finish (blend of Tannat, Merlot and Petit Verdot, about 1/3 each; 12.5% alcohol) 89 points

  • 2012 Pueblo Del Sol Cabernet Sauvignon Roble – Uruguay, Canelones, Juanicó (4/18/2013)
    Dark ruby color; appealing, French oak, ripe cassis, berry nose; juicy, ripe raspberry, cassis, pomegranate palate; for drinking up in 1-2 years; medium-plus finish (12.8% alcohol) 88+ points

  • 2012 Pueblo Del Sol Tannat Reserva – Uruguay, Canelones, Juanicó (4/18/2013)
    Very dark ruby color; ripe raspberry, tart cherry nose; tasty, poised, ripe raspberry, tart berry, light oak palate with refined, sweet tannins; medium-plus finish (12.6% alcohol) 88 points

  • 2012 Pueblo Del Sol Tannat – Uruguay, Canelones, Juanicó (4/18/2013)
    Dark ruby color; focused, tart cherry, tart berry, light herb nose; juicy, tart cherry, tart berry palate with good acidity; medium-plus finish (12.5% alcohol; $10 in U.S.) 87 points

  • 2011 Familia Deicas Tannat Atlantico Sur Reserve – Uruguay, Canelones, Juanicó (4/18/2013)
    Dark purple red violet color; baked berry, boysenberry, berry syrup nose; rich, syrupy textured, berry syrup, ripe berry palate; medium-plus finish (14.5% alcohol) 90 points

  • 2007 Familia Deicas Prelúdio – Uruguay, Canelones, Juanicó (4/18/2013)
    Saturated very dark maroon color; appealing, violets, ripe berry, ripe black currant nose; tasty, rich, tight, ripe black currant, tart berry palate with good acidity; could use 2-3 years; long finish (blend of 30-35% Tannat with Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Franc, Merlot, Petit Verdot and a little Marselan) 93 points

  • 1999 Familia Deicas Prelúdio – Uruguay, Canelones, Juanicó (4/18/2013)
    Very dark red violet color; mature, dried mushroom, tobacco, dried shitakes, beef gravy nose; tasty, mature, tobacco, tart black currant, sauteed mushroom palate with fine, resolving tannins; medium-plus finish 92 points

  • 2008 Familia Deicas Tannat Massimo Deicas Cru – Uruguay, Canelones, Juanicó (4/18/2013)
    Nearly opaque red violet color; very appealing, ripe berry, violets, tart cherry nose; concentrated, delicious, poised, ripe berry, blackberry, violets palate needs 4-5 years and should age well; long finish (100% Tannat; 80% 1 year in new oak) 94 points

  • 1998 Familia Deicas Prelúdio – Uruguay, Canelones, Juanicó (4/18/2013)
    Slightly bricking dark purple red violet color; appealing, mature, truffle, mushroom, ripe berry, ash, roast lamb nose; tasty, complex, poised, tart berry, violets, dried berry, iodine palate; medium-plus finish 93+ points

  • 2009 Pueblo Del Sol Tannat Edicion Limitada 30 Barricas Cosecha – Uruguay, Canelones, Juanicó (4/18/2013)
    Saturated very dark red violet color; appealing, tart berry, ripe black fruit, black fig, dried fig nose; tasty, silky textured, tight, tart blackberry, tart black currant, dried berry, violets palate; could use 1-2 years; medium-plus finish (14.5% alcohol; 18 mos in French and American oak) 91 points

  • 2010 Pueblo Del Sol Tannat Licor de Tannat – Uruguay, Canelones, Juanicó (4/18/2013)
    From 500 ml – very dark purple red violet color; appealing, violets, ripe black cherry, ripe berry, anise nose; rich, ripe berry, black cherry, port-like but light on its feet; long finish (20% alcohol) 91 points

  • 2008 Familia Deicas Tannat Licor de Tannat – Uruguay, Canelones, Juanicó (4/18/2013)
    From 500 ml – Very dark maroon color; rich, port-like, baked berry, violets, fudge nose; rich, poised, tasty, ripe berry, baked berry, dried berry, mulberry, licorice, espresso palate with good acidity; long finish (20% alcohol) 93 points

Marichal

  • 2012 Bodega Marichal Reserve Collection Pinot Noir / Chardonnay – Uruguay, Canelones (4/15/2013)
    Light orange color; strawberry cream, tart cherry nose; unusual, tart cherry, light cherry cream, lightly leesy, lemon palate with a touch of oak and good acidity; medium-plus finish (60% Pinot Noir, 40% Chardonnay; 65% barrel fermented; 13% alcohol) 90+ points

  • 2012 Bodegas Marichal e Hijo Chardonnay – Uruguay, Canelones (4/15/2013)
    Light yellow color; tart pear, almond nose; fresh, crisp, tart pear palate with medium acidity; medium finish (12.5% alcohol; unoaked) 90 points

  • 2013 Bodega Marichal Sauvignon Blanc Premium Varietal – Uruguay, Canelones (4/15/2013)
    Tank sample – cloudy, very light yellow color; tart peach, citrus nose; crisp, clean, very tart citrus, tart grapefruit palate with medium acidity; medium finish 88-90 points

  • 2011 Bodega Marichal Pinot Noir Reserve Collection – Uruguay, Canelones (4/15/2013)
    Medium ruby color; fresh, ripe cherry, cherry pie, lightly floral nose; tasty, pretty, tart cherry, pomegranate, floral, ripe cranberry palate with good balance; medium-plus finish (80% aged 12 mos in oak) 91 points

  • 2011 Bodega Marichal Pinot Noir/Tannat – Uruguay, Canelones (4/15/2013)
    Very dark ruby color; tart red berry, tart cherry, ripe black fruit nose; tasty, soft, fresh, cherry, tart berry palate with good acidity; medium finish (13.5% alcohol; 70% Pinot Noir, 30% Tannat) 88+ points

  • 2011 Bodega Marichal Merlot Premium Varietal – Uruguay, Canelones (4/15/2013)
    Medium dark ruby color; tart cherry, tart red fruit nose; tart cherry, ripe pomegranate palate; short-medium finish (13% alcohol; 4% barrel, 96% aged without oak) 87 points

  • 2009 Bodega Marichal Tannat Grand Reserve “A” – Uruguay, Canelones (4/15/2013)
    Very dark maroon color; appealing, unusual, ripe blackberry, black cherry, baked berry, violets nose; rich, poised, fresh, tart black cherry, blackberry palate; approachable now and should go 10-15 years; medium-plus finish (13.5% alcohol; 18 mos in new oak; from 34 yr old vines) 91+ points

  • 2005 Bodega Marichal Tannat Reserve Collection – Uruguay, Canelones (4/15/2013)
    Very dark maroon color; appealing, maturing, spicy black fruit, clove, licorice nose; rich, tasty, poised, baked berry, ripe berry, ripe black fruit palate with sweet, plush tannins; medium-plus finish 90+ points

  • 2011 Bodega Marichal Tannat Premium Varietal – Uruguay, Canelones (4/15/2013)
    Saturated very dark maroon color; appealing, tart cherry, red berry, lightly herbal nose; tart cherry, dried berry, tart cranberry palate with good acidity; drinkable now; medium-plus finish (13.5% alcohol; 20% new oak) 88+ points

  • 2011 Bodega Marichal Tannat Reserve Collection – Uruguay, Canelones (4/15/2013)
    Very dark ruby color; baked berry, sweet dark chocolate, tart black fruit nose; rich, baked black fruit, tart cherry, lightly smoky palate; approachable nose; medium-plus finish (13% alcohol; 70% in American and French oak for 12 mos) 89 points

Pisano

Pisano sweet wines

Pisano sweet wines

  • 2011 Pisano Pinot Noir Río de Los Pájaros Reserve Brut Nature – Uruguay, Progreso (4/18/2013)
    Light medium orange pink color with .5 millimeter clear meniscus and lots of steady, tiny bubbles; ripe strawberry, lime, green herb nose; rich, tart cherry, tart cranberry palate; medium-plus finish (13.5% alcohol) 90+ points

  • 2012 Pisano Torrontés Río de Los Pájaros Reserve – Uruguay, Progreso (4/18/2013)
    Light yellow color; very mineral, chalk, tart citrus nose; very tasty, minerally, tart citrus, lemon, tart grapefruit palate with medium acidity; medium-plus finish (13.5% alcohol; reminiscent of a Sancerre) 92 points

  • 2012 Pisano Cabernet Franc/Syrah Rosé Reserve – Uruguay, Central (4/18/2013)
    Medium pink color with pale meniscus; appetizing, tart currant, tomato juice nose; tasty, tart tomato juice, very tart currant, saline palate with medium acidity; medium-plus finish (14% alcohol; would be fabulous with a summer gazpacho; very good value at about $14) 92+ points

  • 2011 Pisano Pinot Noir Río de Los Pájaros Reserve – Uruguay, Progreso (4/18/2013)
    Medium dark red violet color; reductive, very tart cherry, tart berry nose; tightly coiled, tart cherry, mineral, tart cranberry palate with medium acidity; could use 1-2 years bottle age; medium-plus finish (13.5% alcohol) 91+ points

  • 2000 Pisano Merlot RPF (Reserva Personal de la Familia) – Uruguay, Progreso (4/18/2013)
    Bricking very dark red violet color; mature, tobacco, tart black fruit, loamy nose; tasty, tart black fruit, black prune, tobacco palate with good balance; medium-plus finish (12.5% alcohol) 92+ points

  • 2011 Pisano Tannat Río de Los Pájaros Reserve Brut Nature – Uruguay, Progreso (4/18/2013)
    Opaque purple red violet color; appealing, savory, pepper, tar, very tart black fruit, oregano nose; tasty, tar, very tart black fruit, tart beets, iodine palate; like a Lambrusco on steroids; medium-plus finish (13.5% alcohol) 92 points

  • 2011 Pisano Tannat/Syrah/Viognier – Uruguay, Progreso (4/18/2013)
    Very dark ruby color; savory, dried beef, meaty, tar, charcoal nose; tasty, savory, tart roasted meat, tar, meat drippings palate with firm tannins; medium-plus finish (13.5% alcohol; 55% Tannat, 40% Syrah, 5% Viognier) 92+ points

  • 2006 Pisano ArretXea Grand Reserve – Uruguay, Progreso (4/18/2013)
    Very dark red violet color; very appealing, black currant, licorice, ripe blackberries, mulberry, dried fig, fudge nose; rich, tasty, complex, tart berry, tart blackberry, licorice, mineral, saline palate with good balancing acidity; medium-plus finish (14% alcohol; 90% Tannat with Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot; astonishing quality for the $35 price) 96 points

  • 2008 Pisano Cabernet Sauvignon RPF (Reserva Personal de la Familia) – Uruguay, Progreso (4/18/2013)
    Very dark red violet color; tart black currant, loam, ripe black fruit nose; rich, ripe black currant, tart blackberry, tart black fruit palate; medium-plus finish (14% alcohol) 93+ points

  • 2009 Pisano Tannat RPF (Reserva Personal de la Familia) – Uruguay, Progreso (4/18/2013)
    Very dark purple red violet color; rich, ripe blackberry, mulberry, deep black fruit, dark chocolate nose; rich, tasty, plush, mulberry, blackberry, tart chocolate palate with good balance; medium-plus finish 93 points

  • 2010 Pisano Tannat Río de Los Pájaros Reserve – Uruguay, Progreso (4/18/2013)
    Very dark ruby color; brooding, roasted plum, tar, charcoal nose; tasty, liquid pepper, tart roasted black fruit, tar, charcoal, green olive palate; could use 2-3 years bottle age; medium-plus finish (13.5% alcohol) 93 points

  • 2002 Pisano Tannat Axis Mundi – Uruguay, Progreso (4/18/2013)
    Opaque purple red violet color; appealing, tar, dried berry, mulberry, espresso nose; rich, tasty, tart blackberry, tart black currant, violets, dried berry, espresso palate; long finish (15% alcohol) 95 points

  • 2008 Pisano Shiraz RPF (Reserva Personal de la Familia) – Uruguay, Progreso (4/18/2013)
    Very dark purple red violet color; appealing, mulberry, violets, baked black fruit, ripe blackberry nose; delicious, rich but complex, tart blackberry, mulberry, iodine, dried blackberry, herbs, anise, saline palate; long finish (14% alcohol) 94+ points

  • 2008 Pisano Petit Verdot RPF (Reserva Personal de la Familia) – Uruguay, Progreso (4/18/2013)
    Nearly opaque purple red violet color; very appealing, graphite, violets, tart blackberry nose; rich, complex, delicious, tar, dried black fruit, pencil lead, blackberry palate; long finish (14% alcohol; best varietal bottling of PV I’ve ever tasted) 95 points

  • 2002 Pisano Tannat Gran Reserva Oculta Don César – Uruguay, Canelones (4/18/2013)
    Opaque red violet color with red violet meniscus; appealing, tar, tart black fruit, espresso, roasted fruit, portobello mushroom nose; tasty, espresso, roasted black fruit, coffee, portobello mushroom palate with good acidity; medium-plus finish 93 points

  • 2006 Pisano Fabula Late Harvest – Uruguay, Progreso (4/18/2013)
    From 375 ml – medium golden amber color with orange lights; appealing, baked apricot, tart peach nose; juicy, baked apricot, tart peach cobbler, nutmeg, Orange Julius, ripe cherry, Rainier cherry, orange liqueur palate with good acidity; medium-plus finish (13% alcohol; blend of late harvest Viognier and Torrontes aged 6 mos in French oak) 94 points

  • 2007 Pisano EtXe Oneko Beltza Likore – Uruguay, Progreso (4/18/2013)
    From 375 ml – opaque black red violet color; dried black fruit, salty, dried fig, espresso nose; concentrated, salty dried prune, dried black fig, black currant, tart blackberry, chocolate syrup palate with a sense of salinity; long finish (16.5% alcohol) 95+ points

Pizzorno

Pizzorno lineup

Pizzorno lineup

  • NV Bodega Carlos Pizzorno Reserva Brut Nature – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    Light yellow color with several steady columns of small bubbles; appealing, lightly yeasty, biscuity, tart pear nose; medium bodied, yeasty, almond, lightly saline, mineral palate with medium acidity; medium-plus finish (50% Chardonnay, 50% Pinot Noir; 2 years on lees; 13.5% alcohol) 89 points

  • NV Bodega Carlos Pizzorno Brut Vino Espumoso Natural – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    Light yellow color with steady, speedy tiny bubbles; appealing, tart pear, lemon nose; tasty, medium bodied, tart citrus, grapefruit, mineral palate with medium acidity; medium finish (13.5% alcohol; 90% Chardonnay, 10% Sauvignon Blanc; 12 mos on the lees) 88+ points

  • NV Bodega Carlos Pizzorno Brut Nature Rosé – Uruguay, Canelones (4/14/2013)
    Light medium yellow pink color with lots of speedy, tiny bubbles; strawberry cream, cherry cream nose; tart strawberry cream, chalk palate with medium acidity; medium-plus finish 88 points

  • 2013 Bodega Carlos Pizzorno Sauvignon Blanc Don Próspero – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    Tank sample – cloudy, light yellow color; intense, tart grapefruit, lightly smoky nose; fresh, tart peach, tart pear palate; medium finish 87-89 points

  • 2011 Bodega Carlos Pizzorno Sauvignon Blanc Reserva – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    Very light yellow color; ripe gooseberry, ripe lime nose; tart gooseberry, ripe lime, mineral palate; medium finish (30% fermented in barrique; 13% alcohol) 89 points

  • 2012 Bodega Carlos Pizzorno Don Próspero Merlot Rosé – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    Light medium orange pink color; light, tart tomato juice, dried orange, tart currant nose; medium bodied, tart currant, tart tomato water palate with good acidity; medium finish (13% alcohol) 88 points

  • 2011 Bodega Carlos Pizzorno Don Próspero Tannat Malbec – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    Dark red violet color; tart plum, light chocolate, ripe black fruit nose; tasty, fresh tart berry, ripe black fruit palate with balance; medium finish (50% Tannat, 50% Malbec; 13.5% alcohol) 87+ points

  • 2011 Bodega Carlos Pizzorno Don Próspero Tannat Merlot – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    Very dark ruby color; lightly smoky, roasted plum, mulberry nose; light-medium bodied, tart plum, anise palate with medium acidity; medium finish (13.5% alcohol) 87 points

  • 2011 Bodega Carlos Pizzorno Pinot Noir Don Próspero – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    Dark cherry red color; tart cherry, black cherry, black raspberry nose; tasty, intense, tart black cherry, tart black raspberry, subtle spice palate with medium acidity; medium-plus finish (13.5% alcohol) 89 points

  • 2006 Bodega Carlos Pizzorno Primo – Uruguay, Canelones, Canelón Chico (4/17/2013)
    Opaque purple red violet color; violets, pencil lead, very tart black currant, dried fig nose; tart black fruit, tar, dried black currant, pencil lead palate; medium-plus finish (50% Tannat, 25% Cabernet Sauvignon, 20% Merlot, 5% Petit Verdot; 13% alcohol; 12 mos in French oak) 90+ points

  • 2011 Bodega Carlos Pizzorno Tannat Don Próspero – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    Dark ruby color; appealing, spicy, tart berry, dried berry, licorice nose; very tart berry, very tart plum, green herbs palate with medium acidity and relatively soft tannins; medium finish (13.5% alcohol) 89 points

  • 2010 Bodega Carlos Pizzorno Tannat Reserva – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    Very dark purple red violet color; lightly smoky, roasted berry, licorice nose; tasty, tart black fruit, anise, baked berry, black raspberry palate; medium finish (13% alcohol; 12 mos in American oak and 1 year in bottle) 88+ points

  • 2010 Bodega Carlos Pizzorno Tinto Reserva – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    Nearly opaque red violet color; appealing, tart black fruit, pencil lead, tart black currant nose; tasty, tart black currant, mineral, pencil lead palate; medium-plus finish (60% Tannat, 30% Cabernet Sauvignon, 10% Merlot; 13.5% alcohol; 1 year in French oak and 1 year in bottle) 91 points

Other Longtime Producers

Irurtia

  • 2011 Dante Irurtia Viognier Roble Reserva – Uruguay, Carmelo (4/16/2013)
    Light lemon yellow color; oak, tart pear, lemon nose; a little heavy, tart lemon palate; medium finish (13.5% alcohol) 86 points

  • 2012 Dante Irurtia Sauvignon Blanc Km.0 Reserva – Uruguay, Carmelo (4/16/2013)
    Light lemon yellow color; tart peach, citrus nose; tart citrus palate with medium acidity; medium finish (12.8% alcohol) 86 points

  • 2006 Dante Irurtia Gewürztraminer Botrytis Excellence Vendange Tardive – Uruguay, Carmelo (4/16/2013)
    From 500 ml – light medium amber color; appealing, baked apricot, golden brown sugar nose; tart apricot, tart baked apricot, tart fruit cocktail syrup, lychee nut palate with some acidity; long finish (13.5% alcohol) 85 points

  • 2012 Dante Irurtia Gewürztraminer Km.0 Reserva – Uruguay, Carmelo (4/16/2013)
    Bright canary yellow color; aromatic, floral, honeysuckle, tart peach nose; tasty, honeysuckle, tart peach, mineral palate with good acidity; medium finish (12.5% alcohol) 89 points

  • 2008 Dante Irurtia Tannat Roble Gran Reserva – Uruguay, Carmelo (4/16/2013)
    Very dark purple red violet color; oak, Bourbon, ripe black currant nose; ripe black currant, tar palate with largely resolved tannins; medium-plus finish (14% in 90% American oak, 10% French) 88 points

  • 2011 Dante Irurtia Cabernet Sauvignon Reserva Single Vineyard – Uruguay, Carmelo (4/16/2013)
    Dark ruby color; appealing, lifted, tart currant, menthol nose; tasty, tart currant, menthol, herbaceous palate with medium acidity; medium-plus finish (13.5% alcohol) 88 points

  • NV Dante Irurtia Medio y Medio – Uruguay, Carmelo (4/16/2013)
    Light yellow color with a lot of medium sized bubbles; appealing, ripe pear, honeysuckle nose; buoyant, ripe pear, honeysuckle palate with good acidity; medium finish (10.5% alcohol) 88+ points

  • 2010 Dante Irurtia Pinot Noir Gran Reserva Carmelo – Uruguay, Colonia (4/16/2013)
    Medium dark cherry red color; oak, dried cherry, iodine nose; tart cranberry palate with medium acidity and drying tannins; medium finish (12 mos in oak) 87 points

  • 2011 Dante Irurtia Tannat Reserva Single Vineyard – Uruguay, Carmelo (4/16/2013)
    Very dark ruby color; tart black currant, very tart black fruit, savory, saline nose; tar, tart black fruit, dried black fruit palate with near medium acidity and drying tannins; medium-plus finish (90% Tannat, 10% Marselan; 13.8% alcohol) 87 points

  • 2007 Dante Irurtia S.A. de Coleccion – Uruguay, Carmelo (4/16/2013)
    Very dark purple red violet color; port-like, dried fruit, dried fig, Fig Newton, coffee, dried apricot nose; mature, dried black fig, spicy black plum palate with low acidity; medium finish (14.3% alcohol; about 1 year in oak) 85 points

  • NV Dante Irurtia Km.0 Cuvee Gran Reserva Edicion Limitada – Uruguay, Carmelo (4/16/2013)
    Very dark purple red violet color; vanilla oak, baked berry, tart black currant nose; soft, baked black fruit, smoke, oak palate with soft tannins, lacking acidity; medium finish (13.9% alcohol; 50% Tannat, 30% Marselan, 20% Cabernet Franc) 84 points

Toscanini & Hijos

Toscanini packaging

Toscanini packaging

  • NV Juan Toscanini & Hijos Extra Brut Espumoso Natural – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    Light yellow color with abundant, speedy, medium-sized bubbles; chalk, tart lime nose; rich, tart lime, tart melon, chalk palate; medium finish (12.5% alcohol; methode champenoise) 86 points

  • 2010 Juan Toscanini & Hijos Chardonnay Reserva – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    Light medium yellow color; ripe pear, banana, pineapple nose; ripe lemon, tart banana palate; medium finish (10 mos in new French oak; 13% alcohol) 83 points

  • 2012 Juan Toscanini & Hijos Sauvignon Blanc Classic – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    Light medium yellow color; tart citrus, chalk nose; tart citrus, chalk palate with medium acidity; medium-plus finish 85+ points

  • 2012 Juan Toscanini & Hijos Tannat Rosé Classic – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    Medium dark orange color; ripe blood orange, cantaloupe nose; cantaloupe, tart blood orange palate; medium finish (2.9 grams RS) 85+ points

  • 2011 Juan Toscanini & Hijos Tannat Merlot – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    Dark ruby color; lifted, tart green herb, green olive nose; tart green olive, tart currant palate with medium acidity; medium finish (60% Tannat, 40% Merlot; 12.5% alcohol) 83 points

  • 2011 Juan Toscanini & Hijos Cabernet Sauvignon Classic Paso Cuello – Uruguay (4/17/2013)
    Dark ruby color; tart currant, herbaceous, green olive nose; tart currant, green olive palate with medium acidity; medium finish (12.4% alcohol) 84 points

  • 2010 Juan Toscanini & Hijos Cabernet Sauvignon Reserva Paso Cuello – Uruguay (4/17/2013)
    Very dark red violet color; oak, toast, charcoal nose; toast, oak, roasted plum palate; needs 1-plus year; medium finish (13.4% alcohol; 7 mos in French and 7 mos in American oak) 83 points

  • 2010 Juan Toscanini & Hijos Tannat Antalogïa Paso Cuello – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    Opaque purple red violet color; toasty, dried berry, coffee extract, ginger cake nose; coffee extract, ginger cake, mocha palate with medium acidity; needs 2-3 years; medium-plus finish (14% alcohol; 18 months in oak) 88 points

  • NV Juan Toscanini & Hijos Rendibú Vino de Solera Paso Cuello – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    From 500 ml – light medium yellow color; oxidative, light nut oil, green olive nose; oxidative, sweet almond oil, green almond palate; medium-plus finish (60% Sauvignon Blanc, 40% Chardonnay; 15.8% alcohol) 87 points

  • 2006 Juan Toscanini & Hijos Adagio Espressivo – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    Very dark purple red violet color; mature, oaky, dried berry nose; mature, oak, coconut, baked black fruit palate with medium acidity and drying, firm tannins; could use 2-plus years; medium-plus finish (30% Cabernet Franc, 30% Merlot, 25% Tannat, 15% Cabernet Sauvignon; 13.5% alcohol) 85 points

  • 2010 Juan Toscanini & Hijos Tannat Reserva – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    Very dark purple red violet color; toast, oak, green peppercorn nose; tight, velvety textured, green peppercorn, toast, oak palate; medium-plus finish 85 points

  • 2011 Juan Toscanini & Hijos Tannat Classic – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    Very dark ruby color; tart currant nose; tart currant, tart cherry palate; short-medium finish (13.5% alcohol) 83+ points

  • NV Juan Toscanini & Hijos Tannat Licor de Tannat Rendibú Paso Cuello – Uruguay, Canelones (4/17/2013)
    From 500 ml – very dark purple red violet color; smoky, tart blackberry, black fig, sweet dark chocolate nose; syrupy, cloying, black currant, black cherry, licorice palate; medium-plus finish (15.4% alcohol; 15 mos in American oak) 85 points

Traversa

  • 2012 Traversa Blanco – Uruguay, Canelones (4/19/2013)
    Light yellow color; VA, tart lemon, paint thinner nose; very tart lemon palate with medium acidity; short finish (14% alcohol; sold as “Prime” in the U.S.) 75 points

  • 2010 Traversa Merlot Viña Salort Roble Reserva – Uruguay, Canelones (4/19/2013)
    Medium red violet color; tart currant, tart plum nose; tart currant, very tart plum palate with medium acidity; medium finish (13.5% alcohol) 86 points

  • 2010 Traversa Merlot Faisan Reserva Privada – Uruguay, Canelones (4/19/2013)
    Dark purple red violet color; herbaceous, tart currant nose; light bodied, very tart currant, herbaceous, olive palate with medium acidity; short-medium finish (12% alcohol) 82 points

  • 2010 Traversa Tannat Viña Salort Tannat Roble – Uruguay, Canelones (4/19/2013)
    Medium dark purple red violet color; tart plum nose; medium bodied, tart plum, tart berry palate with a sense of salinity and medium acidity; medium-plus finish (13% alcohol) 86 points

  • 2011 Traversa Noble Alianza – Uruguay, Canelones (4/19/2013)
    Dark purple red violet color; tart plum, tart berry nose; tart plum, tart currant, cedar palate with medium acidity; medium finish (50% Tannat, 30% Marselan, 20% Merlot; 13.5% alcohol) 86 points

  • 2011 Traversa Cabernet Sauvignon Reserva – Uruguay, Canelones (4/19/2013)
    Medium dark red violet color; tart currant, cedar nose; tart currant, herbaceous palate with medium acidity; medium finish (4-5 mos in 2nd use American oak) 84 points

British Columbia: Okay Wines, Retarded Wine Culture

2013 June 1

image
limited selection at B.C. wine retailer

The North American Wine Bloggers Conference is being held in British Columbia’s Okanagan Valley next weekend, June 6-8, in a small city called Penticton–population 32,000.

I’ve written a couple of posts here on my issues with the the North American Wine Bloggers Conference, based on the one I attended in Virginia in 2011. I criticized a number of features of that conference here. That post sparked quite a bit of debate and led to an effort by conference organizers (a commercial entity that producers bloggers conferences on a variety of subjects) to revamp the programming for the succeeding conference, held last year in Portland. (For more background, see my follow up post here on how I was invited by conference and Wine Blog Awards founder Tom Wark to be part of the committee to make recommendations for the next conference, but was then excluded from that committee by Allan Wright, the head of the company that organizes the conference, Zephyr Adventures.)

At any rate, I understand from several attendees of last year’s Portland conference that the improvements made following my complaints about the Virginia conference did result in a positive difference. And the schedule for the Penticton conference includes a number of sessions that should be of genuine interest to wine bloggers, which was not the case in Virginia. So you’re welcome, WBC organizers and Portland and Penticton attendees.

Based on the reports about the Portland conference, I briefly considered attending the conference being held this year in Penticton. Since I had a business trip to Vancouver for a few days this past September, I decided to sample as many British Columbia wines as I could while I was there–having seen virtually none over the years in the otherwise very diverse wine market here in the San Francisco Bay area. I wanted to use my obligatory business trip to ascertain whether it might be worth my time and expense this month to travel all the way to Penticton (not a place that’s particularly easy to get to) to learn more about B.C.’s primary wine region.

I was a little leery of the region after reading beforehand how relatively new the wine industry is there–in modern terms dating back only to the late 1980s. It was then that more than two thirds of Okanagan vineyards, which had been planted to climate adapted hybrids rather than the vitis vinifera required for fine wines, were uprooted following the 1988 harvest. This was in response to anticipated competition from U.S. wines following adoption of the North American Free Trade Agreement. I also read how difficult it was to grow vinifera grapes in the short, hot growing season found in the Okanagan Valley, and that irrigation was essential there due to arid conditions.

After sampling over two dozen B.C. wines and getting a sense of the (very limited) wine culture of British Columbia’s largest city, Vancouver, I concluded that while there are a few fairly good wines being produced in Okanagan Valley, there was really nothing compelling enough about the region or its wines to lead me to want to spend a significant amount of money and time to learn much more about them at this point.

My reasoning is that there are literally thousands of competing wines from many other parts of the world, including my huge wine producing State of California, that are both higher quality and better values than what I sampled in B.C. Most of those wines are actually available to U.S. consumers, whereas B.C., Canada’s second largest wine growing region, only produces 120 thousand hectoliters of wine per year, barely enough for the local market. (For comparison, California produces nearly 24 million hectoliters annually.) So why should I spend precious time learning and writing about fairly good wines from a small region that hardly makes enough for the local market, let alone for export, when my readers are never going to have a chance to sample the wines for themselves? And why didn’t the organizers of the North American Wine Bloggers Conference consider that point in designing a conference supposedly for the benefit of wine bloggers? Oh, that’s right, because the Okanagan Valley hosts offered to pay the organizers more than any other location did.

Secondly, the backward state of wine culture in British Columbia’s largest city really depressed me. Only one person at a single wine bar was knowledgeable about the region and its wines. Others working at wine bars and wine retail stores I visited showed little or no interest in or knowledge of wine in general, let alone much interest in the wines being produced in their province. If I was going to run into that much wine ignorance in British Columbia’s most sophisticated city–in fricking wine focused establishments for God’s sake–what kind of useful information was I going to get in a small wine country town like Penticton?

The latter judgment is no doubt unfair. Quite possibly Penticton and its surroundings, where presumably passionate winemakers reside, is the only place in B.C. where one is going to get into a serious and informative discussion about wine in general–and Okanagan Valley wine, and what makes it special, in particular. I’m hoping for the sake of my fellow bloggers on their way to this seeming backwater that this assumption is correct. For me, though, the fact that Pentictonite wine producers have yet to educate and interest people who work in the wine business in their province’s greatest city about their wines suggested to me these producers might not be amongst the wine world’s best communicators.

So to be very clear, I have not visited Penticton or the Okanagan Valley, nor do I have any intention of doing so in the foreseeable future. I look forward to the glowing accounts of visits there that should be spewing forth into the blogosphere in the next two or three weeks. I am confident they will paint an attractive picture of dedicated vintners, picturesque vineyards and delicious wines that, unfortunately, just aren’t available anywhere in the U.S. And since the main business of the Okanagan Valley wine industry appears to be agrotourism as opposed to wine production, I am sure conference goers will highlight the appealing sights and hospitality there, to the promotional benefit of the area’s true primary product.

In the meantime, for another point of view on British Columbia’s wine culture, here’s what I learned from scouring Vancouver for the four days I was there last fall for every taste and scrap of information I could get about the province’s wines.

I was staying for a series of meetings at one of Vancouver’s posher hotels, the Fairmont Waterfront. I enlisted the concierges there to supplement my online research about winetasting opportunities in their fair city. Unfortunately, although they are based in the city and presumably connected to more sources of information on the ground than were available to me via the Internet, in over a day of searching they failed to come up with anything more than I did.

That hotel’s Herons Westcoast Kitchen & Bar did feature a monthly rotating wine flight from a selected Okanagan producer. I therefore proceeded to sample the three wines on offer for that month in that single flight of wines from Blasted Church, a winery whose website claims it’s “Okanagan Valley’s most creative, inspired and fun destination for wine lovers.” I was reasonably impressed with the Pinot Gris but not at all by Blasted Church’s other two wines in the flight. Go there for the “fun,” I guess, but not for the wine.

The organization that set up the business event I was attending had scheduled lunches or dinners at some of the city’s better restaurants—including one widely reputed to have a very good wine list, Blue Water Café. I spoke to the somms or wine servers at each of those restaurants, asking for advice on what local wines to taste, and where in the City I could taste more wines. I received little useful information from any of them, and was frankly appalled at the wine pairings Blue Water came up with for the large party I dined with there. For the main course, a delicate white fish, they poured a lousy, oaky Argentine Tannat–I kid you not.

I could only assume they were unloading some of their bad buys on my hapless party, because their choices didn’t evidence anyone who gave a damn about any notion of food and wine somehow complimenting each other. They did have a long wine list with relatively few local wines compared to the European and California producers on offer. They also had a lovely new wine cellar they were anxious to show me when it became clear I was interested in wine. That cellar, however, mainly displayed trophy bottles of Napa Cab, Bordeaux and pricey Italian wines. Clearly, they were not proud enough of the local product to highlight it.

image
Blue Water Cafe

The best wine pairing I experienced in Vancouver was at lunch at the Dockside Restaurant, where I had a very tasty lamb cheek salad. When I asked about domestic Merlots (since Merlot is one of the primary red varieties grown in the region), the server came up with the ’09 Tinhorn Creek, which complemented the meat salad quite nicely.

I walked into several wine stores to check out the (limited) selection and to ask where one could actually sample local wines in the city. Most suggested restaurants, like Blue Water, that were reputed to have good wine lists (not necessarily including many local wines though). I asked about wine bars and places pouring wine by the taste instead of by the bottle or glass, and they just looked at me blankly.

I did know there was a wine bar in Vancouver’s Gastown district, on a hard-to-find street intimidatingly named “Blood Alley,” that friends here in Silicon Valley had recommended highly from their recent trip there. I also found a place called Uva Wine Bar.

image

Unfortunately, Uva mainly offered Italian wines. I tasted all eight of the local wines they had on their list, but the two servers could tell me nothing at all about the wines. Apparently the requirements for working in a wine bar in Vancouver do not include knowing anything about wine or the origins of what’s on the menu. I was, however, able to taste there another four Tinhorn Creek wines –only one of which, the 2010 Gewurz, rated for me above 88 points; a couple of decent Chardonnays with good acidity (from JoieFarm and Mission Hill); and one fairly good Pinot Noir (Cedar Creek).

So that brings us down to the one place in the City of Vancouver—a metropolis of over 600,000 inhabitants–where one can actually taste a small but rather good collection of B.C. wines, served by someone who truly knows something about the wines and their producers. That is the Salt Tasting Room, which my friends in California had told me about, but of which people working at retail wine shops appeared to be universally unaware. It also brings us to the one hero of my frustrating attempt to have a local wine experience in Vancouver—Salt Tasting Room’s Jay Whitelock, pictured below.

image

They had something like 14 B.C. wines available for tasting at Salt Tasting, and I tasted all but a few of them, based on Jay’s knowledgeable recommendations.

I started with a white flight—an old vine Chenin, a white Rhone blend, a Chard and a Gewurztraminer. All were fairly good, and I rated both the ’11 Meyer Gewurz and ’10 DiBello Duncan Vineyards Chard 91 points. Both had complexity, good aromatics and acidity. I then moved on to their rosé flight, in which both the 2011 8th Generation Pinot Meunier Rosé and 2011 Tantalus Pinot Meunier/Pinot Noir Rosés merited, for me, a lover of good rosé, 90+ points. Both, again, had good acidity. I then delved into Jay’s recommended reds, a Pinot, Pinotage and Cab Sauv/Merlot blend. By far the best of that trio was the 2010 La Frenz Pinot Noir Amos Vineyard, the most complex and appealing Pinot of my trip at 91+ points. I finished with one of the two sweet wines on the menu, the one Jay steered me to, which was a Late Harvest Riesling by Poplar Grove. It was okay, nothing special.

The Salt Tasting Room offers little bites, of cheeses and charcuterie to go along with the wines, and these were pretty tasty examples from local producers that were also well labeled and explained.

image
Salt Tasting Room, Vancouver’s only destination for people wanting to sample B.C. wines

So the height of my experience trying to taste some B.C. wines in B.C.’s largest city boiled down to this not inexpensive but fairly satisfying couple of hours at the Salt Tasting Room, with knowledgeable commentary and advice from Jay. Why is this kind of experience such a rare possibility in a large urban city located in a wine producing region?

I did some research when I got back on the possible causes for the retardation of British Columbia’s wine culture and this is what I learned.

Current British Columbia liquor laws and policy, which date back to the repeal of Canada’s version of Prohibition in 1927, do not permit the sampling of wine during wine education classes, such as WSET courses. They require restaurants to buy all their wines from a designated government liquor store. These stores, mostly government monopolies like those in the most backward of our U.S. states when it comes to wine like Pennsylvania, typically have a very limited selection (like the ones I visited). Also the better producers that can sell through their own mailing list or other direct means won’t deal with them, as the wine prices at the stores are greatly increased by heavy government taxes.

B.C. law also permits wineries to have only a single tasting room, which must be located at the site of their winery. Absent such a law, I’m sure there would be a number of B.C. wineries with second tasting rooms in touristy Vancouver, thereby raising local and visitor awareness about B.C. wines. Anti-consumer legislators, however, have yet to authorize such an obvious innovation.

So I guess it’s no wonder, really, why even people in the wine business in Vancouver are basically stupid about B.C. wine. Misguided government over-regulation that’s a hangover from the 1920s has retarded the development of the kind of vibrant wine culture here that one finds in most other major North American cities.

These restrictive laws and regulations reportedly also made it quite difficult for the wine regions and producers from outside B.C. that are coming to next week’s Wine Bloggers Conference—like the wine boards of Uruguay and Greece–to get their wines into the country.

With this background, I have to ask why any wine oriented organization that doesn’t have to do business in B.C.—say a wine conference for writers and bloggers that could be held anywhere—would choose to locate an event there? Why support a government and economy that actively hinders wine awareness, choice and diversity? The WBC organizers, of course, are not wine afficianados–they’re just in the business of blogger conferences and adventure travel–so they presumably didn’t concern themselves with that aspect of B.C.’s wine culture when they saw the amount of money the Okanagan Valley offered for the conference.

Personally, I say screw states and jurisdictions with governmental authorities that pointlessly repress wine awareness and appreciation. Just like I avoid making any non-obligatory, pleasure trips to backward jurisdictions like Pennsylvania in this country, I don’t plan to return to B.C. until there’s a change in the laws, and wine culture, there. I urge other wine lovers to boycott Vancouver and B.C. too, no matter how scenic or “fun” the winery tasting rooms there are reported to be by bloggers returning from WBC. Life is simply too short for spending time in and supporting places that are hostile to, and ignorant about, fine wine.

So my next recommendation for improvement to the WBC organizers is to avoid holding their shindig in any jurisdiction that is hostile to the rights and interests of wine lovers and wine producers. Seems pretty basic, but, just like a lot of what I thought were fairly obvious recommendations I made after the VA WBC debacle, this one apparently needs to be explicitly stated. I expect other wine bloggers to insist on this too.

For additional background on the state of B.C.’s wine industry, I commend to you this summary of a 2011 report by two Canadian university professors who conducted a two year study on the competitiveness of British Columbia wine in the world market. The report’s summary, for the Canadian Wine Magazine WineAccess, asks the headline question, “B.C. wine industry heading for disaster?” According to the article, the report concluded “policy changes are constrained by the use of liquor sales and accompanying protectionism as a cash cow through the provincial monopoly. The bottom line is that no one in BC has a strategic long-term vision for the industry.”

By the way, if you think it’s a good sign that the Canadian wine industry has its own magazine, think again. The magazine announced it was ceasing publication with the Feb/March 2013 issue. According to the President of the media group that owned the publication, “this decision allows a refocusing of the company’s strategy on areas of greater potential growth.”

For my complete tasting notes on the 27 B.C. wines from 18 producers that I was able, through some persistence and resourcefulness, to taste in wine repressive Vancouver despite the design of powers to be there, see below.

—–
6/7/13 Addendum:
I appreciate the many comments on this post by B.C. winemakers and others who are knowledgeable about the negative effects of B.C.’s restrictive wine laws and policies. I urge readers here who are interested in what’s going on in B.C. to review the comments to this post.

I also urge you to check out this radio interview I did on June 6 with Chris Walker on his Daybreak South program in British Columbia: http://www.cbc.ca/player/Shows/ID/2389901282/

VISIT TO VANCOUVER: OKANAGAN WINES – Salt Tasting Room, Blue Water Cafe, Uva Wine Bar and Herons Kitchen, Vancouver, British Columbia (9/23/2012-9/24/2012)

Blasted Church

image

  • 2010 Blasted Church Pinot Gris – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley, Okanagan Valley VQA (9/24/2012)
    Light straw yellow color; aromatic, tart peach, pear, lightly floral nose; crisp, tart pear, tart peach, mineral palate; medium-plus finish 91 points
  • 2010 Blasted Church Chardonnay Musqué – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley, Okanagan Valley VQA (9/24/2012)
    Light yellow color; banana, pear nose; creamy textured, juicy, ripe pear, pineapple, ripe grapefruit palate; medium finish 88 points
  • 2008 Blasted Church Cabernet-Merlot – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley, Okanagan Valley VQA (9/24/2012)
    Very dark red violet color; tart black currant, plum, black fruit, cedar, vanilla nose; medium bodied, tart black currant, tart plum, tart berry, light coffee palate; medium-plus finish 87+ points

CedarCreek

  • 2009 CedarCreek Estate Winery Pinot Noir – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley, Okanagan Valley VQA (9/24/2012)
    Dark ruby color; redolent, baked cherry, black cherry, black raspberry nose; medium bodied, tight, black cherry, black raspberry, baked cherry, black fruit palate; medium-plus finish 90+ points

Clos du Soleil

  • 2010 Clos du Soleil Capella – Canada, British Columbia, Similkameen Valley (9/24/2012)
    Light chartreuse color; lemon grass, light smoke, cat pee nose; medium bodied, lemon grass, ripe citrus palate; medium-plus finish 89 points
  • 2010 Clos du Soleil Celestiale – Canada, British Columbia, Similkameen Valley (9/24/2012)
    Very dark red violet color; tart berry, black fruit nose; tight, tart berry, black currant palate; needs 2-3 years; medium-plus finish 88 points

DiBello

  • 2010 DiBello Wines Chardonnay – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley (9/23/2012)
    Light yellow color; white flower, vanilla, poached pear, light spice nose; rich, medium bodied, poised, tart pear, ripe lemon, mineral palate, reminiscent of a villages Puligny-Montrachet; medium-plus finish 91 points

8th Generation

  • 2011 8th Generation Vineyard Pinot Meunier Rosé – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley (9/23/2012)
    Medium dark orange pink color; intriguing, savory, light pepper, tart pink grapefruit nose; juicy, ripe pink grapefruit, mineral palate with near medium acidity; medium-plus finish 90+ points

JoieFarm

  • 2011 JoieFarm Chardonnay Un-Oaked – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley (9/24/2012)
    Light yellow color; aromatic, tart apple, tart pear nose; juicy, tart apple, tart pear, mineral palate with medium acidity; medium-plus finish (nice, juicy version of an unoaked Chardonnay) 90 points

La Frenz

  • 2010 La Frenz Pinot Noir Amos Vineyard – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley (9/23/2012)
    Very dark ruby color; stewed black cherries, dried berries, blackberry, creosote nose; complex, medium bodied, garrigue, very tart berry, tart black cherry, mineral palate; needs 4 years; medium-plus finish 91+ points

Lake Breeze

  • 2009 Lake Breeze Vineyards Meritage – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley, Okanagan Valley VQA (9/24/2012)
    Very dark red violet color; intense, baked black fruit, VA nose; high pitched, tart black fruit, light pepper, tart plum palate with near medium acidity; medium-plus finish 86 points

Meyer Family

  • 2011 Meyer Family Vineyards Gewürztraminer McLean Creek Road Vineyard – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley, Okanagan Valley VQA (9/23/2012)
    Very light yellow color; aromatic, white roses, light potpourri, lemon blossom nose; very poised, juicy, ripe peach, ripe grapefruit, palate; medium finish (good with Thai and Indonesian food, chevre) 91 points

Mission Hill

  • 2010 Mission Hill Chardonnay S.L.C. – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley, Okanagan Valley VQA (9/24/2012)
    Light lemon yellow color; ripe pear, white jasmine nose; tart pear, mineral, white jasmine palate; medium-plus finish 91 points

Pentâge

  • 2011 Pentâge Winery Rosé – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley, Okanagan Valley VQA (9/23/2012)
    Medium pink color with pale meniscus; very ripe currant, banana nose; ripe currant, light-medium bodied, cherry palate; medium finish (Gamay Noir) 88 points

Poplar Grove

  • 2009 Poplar Grove Winery Riesling Late Harvest – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley (9/23/2012)
    Light medium yellow color; lifted, petrol, light apricot nose; baked peach, tart apricot, grapefruit syrup palate with minerality and medium acidity; medium-plus finish 89 points

Road 13

  • 2011 Road 13 Chenin Blanc Old Vines – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley, Okanagan Valley VQA (9/23/2012)
    Light lemon yellow color; fresh green hay, green pear, green apple, mineral, light lanolin nose; tasty, medium bodied with good density, light lanolin, tart green pear, mineral palate; medium-plus finish (would be good with green vegetable dishes and salads) 90 points

Sandhill

  • 2010 Sandhill Cabernet-Merlot Sandhill Estate Vineyard – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley, Okanagan Valley VQA (9/23/2012)
    Dark red violet color; tart currant, pyrazine, bell pepper nose; ripe currant, red berry, pyrazine palate with soft tannins and little structure; medium finish 87 points

Stag’s Hollow

  • 2010 Stag’s Hollow Sauvignon Blanc – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley (9/23/2012)
    Light yellow color; cream, tart peach nose; medium bodied, tart peach, mineral palate with medium acidity; medium-plus finish 91 points

Stoneboat

  • 2009 Stoneboat Vineyards Pinotage – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley, Okanagan Valley VQA (9/23/2012)
    Very dark purple red violet color; savory, tart prune, sweet smoke, pepper, roasted cherry nose; dense, medium-plus bodied, roasted fruit, tar, pepper sausage palate; medium-plus finish 88+ points

Tantalus

  • 2011 Tantalus Vineyards Rosé – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley, Okanagan Valley VQA (9/23/2012)
    Medium orange pink color; ripe currant, tart cranberry nose; light-medium bodied, juicy, tart currant, tart cranberry, mineral palate with medium acidity; medium finish 90+ points
  • 2010 Tantalus Vineyards Riesling – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley, Okanagan Valley VQA (9/24/2012)
    Light yellow color; ripe peach, apricot, baked apricot, oak nose; medium bodied, ripe peach, apricot palate; medium finish 88 points

Terravista

  • 2011 Terravista Vineyards Figaro – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley (9/23/2012)
    Light yellow color; aromatic, straw, tart pear, white grapefruit nose; medium bodied, tart pear, mineral, light citrus palate with white grapefruit rind on finish; medium-plus finish (would be good with salads, chicken with lemon; blend of Viognier, Marsanne and Roussanne) 90 points

Tinhorn Creek

  • 2010 Tinhorn Creek Gewürztraminer – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley, Okanagan Valley VQA (9/24/2012)
    Very light yellow color; aromatic, floral, roses, geranium nose; light-medium bodied, poised, tart peach, floral, geranium, mineral palate, quite dry; medium-plus finish 90+ points
  • 2010 Tinhorn Creek Chardonnay – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley, Okanagan Valley VQA (9/24/2012)
    Light yellow color; poached pear, pineapple syrup, vanilla nose; creamy textured, medium bodied, vanilla oak, cream, poached pear palate; medium finish 87 points
  • 2008 Tinhorn Creek Pinot Noir – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley, Okanagan Valley VQA (9/24/2012)
    Dark garnet red color; baked cherry, roses nose; tart red fruit, rosehips, mineral palate with medium acidity; needs 2-3 years; medium-plus finish (reminiscent of a Villages Gevrey) 88 points
  • 2009 Tinhorn Creek Merlot – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley, Okanagan Valley VQA (9/23/2012)
    Dark purple red violet color; smoky, tart black fruit, roasted plum, graphite nose; tasty, tart black fruit, spicy plum palate with smooth, sweet tannins; medium-plus finish (14.8% alcohol; 12 mos in barrel) 91 points
  • 2008 Tinhorn Creek 2 Bench Red Oldfield Series – Canada, British Columbia, Okanagan Valley, Okanagan Valley VQA (9/24/2012)
    Dark purple red violet color; VA, baked berry, honey baked beans nose; maturing, baked plum, cherry sauce, baked beans palate; medium finish 86 points

Sanford & Benedict: Historic Vineyard’s Story Told for First Time by Co-Founder

2013 May 29
Michael Benedict, speaking for the first time publicly since 1980 about the history of Sanford & Benedict (photo courtesy Baron Spafford)

Michael Benedict, speaking for the first time publicly since 1980 about the history of Sanford & Benedict (photo courtesy Baron Spafford)

Sanford & Benedict is one of California’s most historically significant and renowned vineyards because it proved two things: Santa Barbara County is a superlative spot for growing Pinot Noir, and the portion of the Santa Ynez Valley where it is located, now known as the Sta. Rita Hills appellation, is a fabulous cool climate location for vines in general.

The two men responsible for the significant achievements of this vineyard are Richard Sanford and Michael Benedict. They were partners from 1970 to 1980, when Richard Sanford sold his interest in the vineyard and went on to found Sanford Winery. Michael remained in charge of the vineyard, which was, for a time, renamed the Benedict Vineyard, until he and his financial backers sold it on in 1990 to a British couple who, in turn, brought Sanford back in to manage the vineyard.

Richard Sanford has been justly celebrated as a California Pinot Noir pioneer, Sta. Rita Hills founder and organic wine producer, becoming the first Santa Barbara vintner to be inducted into the Vintners Hall of Fame at a ceremony I attended in February 2012. His former partner Michael Benedict has, however, kept a low profile in the wine world since his departure from his eponymous vineyard, refusing even to comment for articles about the history of the vineyard and his and Sanford’s pioneering accomplishments.

That changed last week, when a group of Santa Barbara County winemakers met in the old barn at Sanford & Benedict, which had served as the winery during Sanford and Benedict’s tenure there, to hear Michael Benedict talk about the vineyard’s first 20 years. I was fortunate to be included in this august gathering, and to join with the assembled winemakers in tasting and hearing about some of the wines made from this special vineyard, including a couple of older examples. The co-host for this event with Michael Benedict was current Sanford winemaker Steve Fennell.

May 23 gathering to hear from Michael Benedict (photo courtesy Baron Spafford)

May 23 gathering to hear from Michael Benedict (photo courtesy of Baron Spafford)


The winemakers on hand were basically a who’s who of Santa Barbara County vintners, including long time winemakers Greg Brewer, Ken Brown, Matt Dees, John Falcone, Richard Longoria, Chad Melville and Billy Wathen; and newer winemakers Gavin Chanin, Dieter Cronje, Ryan Deovlet, Matt Murphy, Raj Parr  and Justin Willet. 

Benedict began his recollections in the late 1960s, when he and Sanford became sailing buddies, making periodic trips off the coast of Santa Barbara County. At the time, Benedict was an academic, a botanist with U.C. Santa Barbara, and Richard Sanford, who had graduated with a degree in geography from U.C. Berkeley and served as a navigator on a U.S. Navy destroyer during the Vietnam War, was working in video production. 

According to Benedict, he and Sanford used to talk about the “looming” wine business. Mondavi and others in Napa had begun receiving a lot of attention in the late 1960s. Michael told us, “There was a lot of capital chasing vineyard ideas, and a lot more capital available than people willing to put it to use.”

Michael had worked as a botanist on Santa Cruz Island where a vineyard—the Justinian Caire Co. Vineyard–was planted in the 1880s that had been very successful. Unfortunately, when Prohibition came, all the vines there were ripped out, on the theory that vines in this remote location would be particularly attractive to bootleggers. 

Michael became fascinated by trying to work out why they had planted the vineyard on the island in the first place instead of in a more convenient location on the mainland. He knew the climate there well. He then started thinking about the effect of sunshine and cool weather on grape vines. He started compiling data on that from various regions in France and the West Coast of the U.S. 

What he found was that the existing “California vineyard” was generally too hot to grow French wine varieties well. He thought about areas in California with cooler climates and longer growing seasons, and ultimately saw the opportunity in Santa Barbara County to try something new.

Together, Michael and Richard developed an idea for the Santa Barbara area that was attractive to investors. Originally the idea was just that Santa Barbara County was a really good place to grow grapes. Uriel Nielson’s vineyard, planted in the Santa Maria Valley in 1964, had proven that. Nielson was growing grapes—Cabernet Sauvignon and Riesling–and selling them to Napa producers at premium prices. 

Michael and Richard bought Cabernet Sauvignon and Riesling cuttings from the Nielsons and propagated them as rooted stem cuttings in 1970 for a vineyard location that they hoped soon to find. That year, Michael told us he spent a lot of time on the road checking out the climate and plantings up and down the West Coast, including the Willamette Valley, Okanagan Valley and Sonoma. He told us he ended up publishing a piece on potential areas for vineyards with lots of sunshine where the temperature did not get very hot. 

Michael and Richard identified an area in the Santa Ynez Valley where the climate was really good, not just for Burgundian varieties, but simply similar to the weather in “maritime France.”  Michael (presumably alongside Richard—-Michael told the story in the first person, but it tracks with Richard’s published recollections of driving around the area with a thermometer sticking out of the windshield of his 1950 Mercedes) drove around looking to find a place in the area that stayed below 80 degrees during the hottest times, ideally in the high 70s. 

Sanford & Benedict Vineyard looking north, toward Sea Smoke

Sanford & Benedict Vineyard looking north, toward Sea Smoke Vineyards on opposite foothills


Finding the land in the particular location in the valley that became Sanford & Benedict was then, according to Michael, just a matter of luck. The particular real estate just happened to be available. Its owner had bought the 473-acre parcel south of the Santa Ynez River–which had once been dry farmed for beans and barley–after the announcement that a dam was going in nearby, thinking the land could be developed as lake front property and a resort. When the dam project got cancelled, the land prices in the area plummeted. 

Michael and Richard made an offer to lease with an option to buy in five years, allowing them to get in with relatively little cash outlay. They planted their Cabernet and Riesling vines on their own roots there in 1971. 

Over the preceding year, after obtaining the cuttings from the Nielsons, Michael told us he’d come across information on work done by Louis Martini, Martin Ray and others who had experience trying to grow Burgundian varieties in California. As a result, he and Richard both started getting more excited about the possibilities of growing Chardonnay and Pinot Noir in cooler parts of the Santa Barbara area.

Karl L. Wente, third generation winemaker/owner at Livermore’s Wente Brothers and a protégée of Martin Ray and Paul Masson, recommended that Michael and Richard take some of the extra Pinot Noir and Chardonnay vines Karl had started for his vineyard in Arroyo Seco. He insisted they were the best choices available for planting these varieties because Martin Ray had told Karl these clones or selections would make the greatest wines. So they went with Wente’s advice and took 9,000 rooted vines from him.

Michael made it clear to us that the Pinot Noir they received from Wente and planted at Sanford & Benedict was not technically Mount Eden clone. That particular, cleaned up, virus-free clone was not released until 1980. What they planted is simply what Karl Wente had obtained from Martin Ray’s Mount Eden Vineyard. Michael described them as suitcase clones “from Chambertin via Paul Masson, via Martin Ray, via Wente.” So they are properly referred to as a selection from Mount Eden.

Original, own-rooted Mount Eden selection Pinot Noir at Sanford & Benedict

Original, own-rooted Mount Eden selection Pinot Noir at Sanford & Benedict

They planted the vineyard basically without irrigation and it grew for 20 years without irrigation. They did water the young vines for the first year only by digging a basin around them and using a contraption on a truck to give each new vine about one and a half gallons at a time. The second year they relied on natural rainfall. The roots went deep, according to Michael, “because the vines had no choice.”

In 1975, they made their first wine, three barrels of Pinot Noir, in a spot near Michael’s house at the back of Sanford & Benedict. The extract levels and balance of that wine suggested they were really onto something. Ken Brown, who founded Byron and who now runs Ken Brown Wines, told me he remembered tasting that first wine with Michael and Richard. It stuck in his mind as a revelation and inspiration.

In 1976 Sanford and Benedict made their first commercial release, the 1976 Sanford & Benedict Pinot Noir, which was released in 1978. Firestone had built a big winery but had no grapes yet, so they made their first wines there.

This initial commercial vintage received unusually high acclaim. Robert Balzer wrote about it for the Los Angeles Times in an article entitled “American Grand Cru in a Lompoc Barn.” Dan Berger, also writing for the Times, called the Pinot “a wine of cult proportions.”

In 1976, Michael told us they refurbished the old barn on the property –- the one with a layer of yellow lichen on the front in which we were assembled for this event –making it into what it looks like today. They had to reinforce and insulate it. They left the doors open to let the cold air blow through. At night, according to Michael, it was generally always in the low 50s. On the roof, they installed a row of misters. Michael explained that if they kept the roof slightly moist the barn “acted like a swamp cooler refrigerator.” Their first open top fermenters were made from white oak by a friend, Gary Gordon, who owned a hot tub factory. 

Old barn that once housed Sanford & Benedict Winery (photo courtesy Baron Spafford)

Old barn that once housed Sanford & Benedict Winery (photo courtesy Baron Spafford)

Michael told us that the Cabernet they had planted was often green and had the usual problems of cold climate Cabernet. They also planted Merlot. Michael claimed that from 1976 to 1979 they made great Cabernet and Merlot. The wine was labeled Cabernet, the bottles had red capsules, but the wine was really a blend. Bill Wathen and Rick Longoria also both made Merlot from the vineyard. Michael said the Riesling also did well there. He opined that the vineyard is simply, “a great site for vinifera.” Nonetheless, due to the increasing demand for Pinot Noir, the Cabernet, Merlot and Riesling were eventually grafted over to Pinot Noir.

In 1980, Richard sold his interest in the vineyard to Michael and the other investors. In interviews, Richard’s repeated explanation for his departure at that time has been that it was “hard to make wine by committee.” He went on to found Sanford Wines with his wife Thekla in Buellton in 1981. In 1982 they planted the small Rancho El Jabali Vineyard on their own home property to the east of Sanford & Benedict. Michael continued to operate Sanford & Benedict from that point, growing the grapes, selling off most of the production and making a small amount of wine.

For a time in the mid- and late ‘80s, the vineyard became known as the Benedict Vineyard. Toward the end of our session, Richard Longoria poured us a fabulous 1987 Pinot Noir he had made, that smelled just like a great old Barolo and still possessed amazing power and structure, that was designated “Benedict Vineyard.”

older wines at May 23 tasting (photo courtesy Baron Spafford)

older wines at May 23 tasting (photo courtesy Baron Spafford)

Michael told us he found managing the vineyard in the late 1980s very challenging, so he and his investors took the opportunity to cash out in 1990. The buyers were British wine collectors Robert and Janice Atkin. According to Michael, the Atkinses asked Michael to stay on but Michael recommended that they work with Sanford instead. According to published accounts based on Sanford’s side of the story, the Sanfords were silent partners in the deal with the Atkins.

At any rate, in 1990 Richard Sanford began managing Sanford & Benedict, using most of the vineyard’s fruit for his own Sanford Winery. 

In 1991 irrigation was installed. This initially led to a huge increase in yields—going from about three quarters of a ton to the acre to nearly five tons an acre. John Winthrop Haeger in his 2004 book North American Pinot Noir records the opinion of Au Bon Climat’s Jim Clendenen that the irrigation had a “negative impact on quality” for about five years, until 1996. Yields have since stabilized at about two to two and a half tons per acre.

Sanford planted La Rinconada Vineyard on adjacent property to the west in 1995. In 2000, he planted La Encantada Vineyard also in Santa Rita Hills. By then Sanford Winery was producing nearly 50,000 cases of wine annually, making it one of Santa Barbara County’s biggest producers.

In the late 1990s the Sanfords started erecting Richard’s dream winery on the La Rinconada Vineyard site. It was built with handmade adobe bricks, stone and recycled timbers. They ultimately finished in 2001, with the initial four million dollar cost estimate having ballooned to $10 million or so. 

Wine sales, unfortunately, dipped in 2001 and lenders needed to be paid. In 2002, the Sanfords received a cash infusion by entering into a marketing relationship with Paterno Wines International (now Terlato Wines International, based in Chicago). 

With sales continuing to remain slow over the next few years, capital calls reportedly allowed the Terlato Wine Group ultimately to gain a majority share in Sanford Winery. In 2006, Terlato–which also owns Alderbrook Vineyards in Dry Creek Valley, and Chimney Rock and Rutherford Hill wineries in Napa, among other properties–bought out the Sanfords completely, taking over the Sanford name, winery and estate vineyards.

Steve Fennell (left) with Michael Benedict (photo courtesy Baron Spafford)

Steve Fennell (left) with Michael Benedict (photo courtesy Baron Spafford)


Steve Fennell, who started as winemaker at Sanford in 2006, brought the gathering up to date on what had transpired at Sanford in connection with Sanford & Benedict since that time. Steve told us he had gotten to know Michael over the last year. Almost three years previously, Michael had first called him looking for cuttings from Sanford & Benedict. 

In 2006 and 2007, the Terlato-owned Sanford Winery purchased fruit from Sanford & Benedict. In 2007, the Terlatos recognized the quality and potential of the vineyard and purchased it from the Atkinses, thereby reuniting Sanford Winery with its longtime fruit source. At that time, the vineyard comprised 134 planted acres. 

The Terlato team then surveyed the vineyard for virused and otherwise unhealthy plants.  In 2008 they replanted 35 acres. In 2010 they planted an additional 11 acres, so there are now a total of 145. In 2011 they replanted 26 acres, along with implementing a major retrofit of the old, healthy vines, changing them from California sprawl to a parallel, divided canopy with four canes on the healthy vines. The lead viticulturalist on this was Erik Mallea, who was then employed by Coastal Management Services. The Terlatos brought Erik and the farming in house in 2013.

After the replanting and new plantings, there are 53 acres still remaining from the ‘70s; 22 more are plantings from the early ‘90s. The original plantings are on their own roots (or vinifera roots anyway, in the case of some original plantings of Cabernet and Riesling that were grafted over to Pinot Noir). Young vines comprise 70 acres. The vineyard is now planted to 11 different clones of Pinot Noir, along with 23 acres of Chardonnay and seven of Viognier. 

The rows of the original plantings are spaced 12 feet apart. The intermediate plantings, from the early ‘90s, are 10 feet apart. The newest plantings are only six feet apart.

It’s actually a 500-acre ranch. The elevation from the lowest to highest point of the ranch varies by about 1,000 feet. Steve estimates they could plant another 50 to 60 acres. Areas near and along the ridge would get too much wind, so vines there would not ripen—the wind at a certain point causes the plant to simply shut down. The existing vineyard has a gentle northern slope and forms a large bowl, which helps protect the vines to some degree from the constant wind that blows through the area from the ocean. Another challenge is getting sufficient water to some parts of the potential new planting areas. 

view to the east from Sanford & Benedict, showing a portion of the ridge

view to the east from Sanford & Benedict, showing a portion of the ridge

For Steve it’s been fascinating working with both Sanford & Benedict and La Rinconada next door, as he finds the wines from the two neighboring vineyards always distinctly different. They currently retain about 70% of the Sanford & Benedict fruit for Sanford Winery, selling the remaining 30% to other producers, with the largest amount going to Au Bon Climat. For the Sanford wines designated as Sanford & Benedict, they usually blend at least two or three blocks. Which ones they ultimately use depend on the vintage.

“The remarkable thing,” Michael Benedict told us, “is the dirt out there. It’s probably one of the two or three greatest locations in the Santa Rita Hills.” 

Michael did not go into the significance of the soils in any detail, but Matt Kramer, in his 2004 volume entitled New California Wine: Making Sense of Napa Valley, Sonoma, Central Coast, and Beyond, opines that what the Santa Rita Hills location offers is not just a cool climate, very similar to that in Santa Maria Valley, but its special soils. He explains these include, “Botella clay loam or Montery shale. It’s a blackish loam soil capable of imparting a distinctive, appealing earthiness to Pinot Noir. Botella clay is what makes Sanford & Benedict Vineyard so distinctive.”

Michael did, however, echo the sentiments of the assembled vintners currently making wine from the vineyard when he said, “This place has been tended from the beginning with lots of love and care, and continues to be.” He told us he made some wine in 2012 from Pinot Noir and Chardonnay there, and finds it extraordinary how good the raw material is. According to Michael, “the wines are getting better and better.”

After Michael and Steve spoke, we tasted several wines based on Sanford & Benedict grapes made by some of the assembled winemakers. At the end of the program, we adjourned for lunch outside in front of the old barn, and sampled a few more wines, mostly from Sanford & Benedict grapes. My tasting notes for all of the wines from Sanford & Benedict fruit appear at the end of this post, below.

Raj Parr told us he first started buying fruit from Sanford & Benedict for his Sandhi label in 2009. He explained that, over the years, he had mistaken Sanford & Benedict wines many times in blindtastings for Burgundy. What Raj says he finds interesting about the vineyard is the vine age, that the older vines are own rooted, and that the vines face north, “all of which seems to contribute to the wines’ freshness and acidity.”

Ryan Deovlet began buying fruit from Sanford & Benedict three years ago; 2010 was his first vintage from the vineyard for his relatively new Deovlet label. Now he’s getting three tons of fruit. He gets his fruit from block T15, a block of old vine Chardonnay.

Own Rooted Original Chardonnay planting in Sanford & Benedict's Block T3

Own rooted original Chardonnay planting in Sanford & Benedict’s Block T3


Jonata winemaker Matt Dees explained to me that Jonata doesn’t grow Chardonnay and Pinot Noir, and that they looked for old vines for their Burgundian varietal project called The Hilt. They get some Chardonnay from Sanford & Benedict, from block T3, and also some fruit from the Solomon Hills. Matt finds the extract on the Sanford & Benedict Pinot Noir, which they get from old vine blocks T1, T2 and T3, very high. Tyler owner/winemaker Justin Willett thinks the high extract levels are probably due to their own rootedness, which give them lots of structure. 

In 2008, Jonata took over farming of blocks T1, T2 and T3. They decided to change the trellising to vertical shoot positioning and as soon as they did, were rewarded by two severe frosts that left them only one quarter ton per acre. They ultimately switched to quadrilateral cordons, which have worked well according to Matt. Matt also told us that Esca disease had shown up on some of the vines in 2011, adding a black pepper spice note to the fruit.

Gavin Chanin gets fruit for his new Lutum project, a joint venture with Sonoma based winemaker Bill Price, from blocks T5, 6 and 10. This includes some of the new plantings. He first visited the vineyard in 2004, which was his first year working harvest at Au Bon Climat. 

Gavin is intrigued by how deep the wines are from this site, “elegant, with fruit, structure and spice.” According to Gavin, what distinguishes this vineyard is “perfect climate with amazing soil that’s been farmed better and better every year since 2004. So that leaves us no excuses on the winemaking side.”

Interestingly, despite the huge acclaim for the early wines from Sanford & Benedict, few initially followed the pioneers into this section of the Santa Ynez Valley. Lafond had planted there the same year as Sanford and Benedict. Babcock followed in 1978. Plantings there only really took off beginning at the end of the 1990s. Vineyards were planted at Clos Pepe and Melville as well as Sea Smoke and Fiddlestix. The petition to establish the Santa Rita Hills AVA was submitted in 1998 and ultimately approved in 2001.

In sum, it appears evident that Richard Sanford and Michael Benedict’s instincts regarding planting in a cooler site like this portion of the Santa Ynez Valley certainly paid off. They also appear to have been fortunate in getting a good selection of Chardonnay and Pinot Noir from Karl Wente as the base for their vineyard. They also lucked into benefiting from the Santa Rita Hills’s soils, which seem to have a special affinity for Pinot Noir. 

It appears to be quite fortunate that the vineyard is now in the hands of well funded, solid stewards who respect the legacy they have acquired—the Terlatos—and that, as a result, the vineyard is probably the healthiest it has ever been. 

The Sanford & Benedict Vineyard has already achieved a lot in proving that Santa Barbara can produce excellent Pinot Noir and that the Sta. Rita Hills appellation is one of the best cool climate vine growing locations in the state. Under its current management, the vineyard appears poised for continued success and achievement as the source of special fruit for potentially wonderful wines.

Santa Barbara County winemakers who gathered to hear from Michael Benedict (photo courtesy Baron Spafford)

Santa Barbara County winemakers who gathered to hear from Michael Benedict (photo courtesy Baron Spafford)

Here are my notes on the wonderful Sanford & Benedict designated wines we tasted on this memorable occasion.

Older Examples

  • 1987 Longoria Pinot Noir Sanford & Benedict
    Bricked medium red color; appealing, mature, incense, dried cherry, old-Barolo-like nose; mature, silky textured, very spicy, dried berry with prodigious extract; long finish (13.4% alcohol; smelled and tasted like a mature Barolo, I’ve never tasted a California Pinot like it, truly memorable) 95 points
  • 1979 Sanford & Benedict Pinot Noir Sanford & Benedict
    Bricked medium red color; mature, tobacco, dried cranberry nose; firmly structured yet, tobacco, dried cranberry, mineral palate with medium acidity; medium-plus finish (past its prime, but reminiscent of Williams Selyem Pinot Noir from a similar vintage) 90 points

Younger Chardonnays
IMG_1808

  • 2008 Brewer-Clifton Chardonnay Sanford & Benedict
    Light lemon yellow color; reduction, tart lemon, saffron nose; tasty, almond, ripe lemon, saffron, mineral palate; medium-plus finish 93 points
  • 2011 Deovlet Chardonnay Sanford & Benedict Vineyard
    Light yellow color; a little reduction, almond, tart pear nose; poised, rich, almond, tart pear, tart lemon, mineral palate; could use 2 years of bottle age; medium-plus finish (an exciting Cali Chard; 13.4% alcohol; picked at about 22.5 brix; 1/2 malo) 93+ points
  • 2011 Sandhi Wines Chardonnay Sanford & Benedict
    Light medium lemon yellow color; tart lemon, tart pear, lemon oil, white jasmine, almond nose; rich, tasty, firmly textured, ripe lemon, tart pear, mineral palate with medium acidity; should age very well; medium-plus finish (13.2% alcohol per Raj; picked at about 21 brix; 25% new oak; full malolactic; from vines planted in early ’70s) 93 points
  • 2011 Tyler Chardonnay Sanford & Benedict
    Light yellow color; very appealing, almond, hazelnut, pear, butter nose; tasty, poised, creamy textured, tart pear palate; medium-plus finish 93+ points

Younger Pinot Noirs

Sanford Pinot Noirs and Chardonnay

Sanford Pinot Noirs and Chardonnay

  • 2012 Lutum Pinot Noir Sanford & Benedict
    Barrel sample – very dark ruby color; appealing, tart berry, tart cherry, pepper nose; tight, tart cherry, tart pepper, mineral palate with a sense of dried herbs; will need 3-plus years; medium-plus finish 92-93 points
  • 2011 Sanford Pinot Noir Old Block Sanford & Benedict
    Pre-release – medium dark ruby color; very appealing, roses, tart cherry, rosehips nose; tight, tart cherry, cranberry, tart raspberry, mineral palate; could use 2-3 years bottle age; medium-plus finish (not yet labeled) 93+ points
  • 2011 Sanford Pinot Noir Sanford & Benedict
    Dark ruby color; appealing, bright red fruit, tart cherry, ripe raspberry nose; tasty, poised, light-medium bodied, silky textured, tart cranberry, very tart cherry, mineral, sous bois palate; medium-plus finish 93 points
  • 2010 Sanford Pinot Noir Sanford & Benedict
    Opaque red violet color; very appealing, ripe raspberry, tart cherry, raspberry jam nose; tasty, creamy textured, ripe raspberry, raspberry jam palate with good acidity; medium-plus finish 92 points
  • 2009 Sanford Pinot Noir Sanford & Benedict
    Very dark ruby color; appealing, ripe cherry, black raspberry, baked raspberry nose; tasty, tightish, tart raspberry, black raspberry, baked raspberry, baked strawberry, ripe cranberry palate; medium-plus finish 92+ points
  • 2011 The Hilt Pinot Noir Old Guard
    Dark ruby color; very appealing, aromatic, tart cherry, tart berry, green herbs nose; tight, rich, tart cherry, cranberry, mineral palate with medium acidity; needs 3-4 years; medium-plus finish (picked at 21.5 brix; 100% destemmed) 92+ points
  • 2011 Tyler Pinot Noir Sanford & Benedict
    Very dark cherry red color; very appealing, tart cherry, forest floor, savory, light green peppercorn nose; tight, silky textured, tart cranberry, mineral, green peppercorn palate with lots of extract; could use 3-plus years; medium-plus finish (from top 4 rows of block T13) 92+ points

More Santa Barbara Deliciousness: Longoria and Rusack

2013 May 23

IMG_0718
Bordeaux varieties planted at Rusack’s Ballard Canyon vineyard

Two more Santa Barbara County producers I visited last month whose wines greatly impressed me possess winemakers who are highly respected by their peers. Both winemakers–Longoria’s Richard Longoria and Rusack’s Steven Gerbac–are modest, low key, high achievers who constantly experiment, searching for ways to improve their already excellent wines.

As it happens, Longoria and Gerbac’s careers intersected long ago: Gerbac’s eighth grade science project involved studying malolactic fermentation with Longoria.

Richard Longoria has been making wine for nearly 40 years. He’s a self-described product of the Sixties counterculture, who graduated from U.C. Berkeley in 1973. He feels this led him early on to a “non-establishment” kind of career, winemaking.

Longoria is gentle and soft spoken, and seems to have a boundless interest in new techniques and experiments going on in the winemaking world: from ocean-submersion wine aging experiments to the Italian Ganimede fermenter, which utilizes the CO2 gas that builds up during fermentation to gently percolate the grape must. Longoria now employs a Ganimede for a portion of his Pinot Noir and Tempranillo.

Longoria, known as Rick in Santa Barbara’s winemaking community, found his first job in wine at Sonoma’s Buena Vista Winery. There he met famous pioneering California winemaker Andre Tchelistcheff who was consulting there. Tchelistcheff told Rick about Firestone’s new winery in Santa Barbara where he was also consulting, and shared with him his excitement about Santa Barbara’s wine producing potential.

Rick had spent some of his teen years in Santa Barbara when his father, an enlisted serviceman, was stationed at Vandenberg Air Force Base. When Tchelistcheff let Rick know that Firestone was looking for a cellar foreman, Rick interviewed, got the job and moved to Los Olivos in 1976.

Rick left Santa Barbara for a job as Cellarmaster at Napa’s Chappellet Vineyards in 1978, but soon returned when he heard about a position at a new small winery, J. Carey Cellars, where he came on as winemaker in 1979.

Rick and his wife Diana, whom he had met while working at Firestone, launched Longoria Wines in 1982 with a focus on Pinot Noir and Chardonnay. Those were two grapes he wasn’t working with as winemaker for J. Carey, and he felt those grapes were showing particular promise in Santa Barbara County.

Rick moved on in 1985 to become winemaker for The Gainey Vineyard, a new state-of-the-art winery on the 3600-acre Gainey Ranch. He continued in that position for 12 years before deciding, with Diana, to devote their full efforts to their own wine business in 1997.

The Longorias relied entirely on purchased fruit until Rick had a chance to plant his own vineyard, a partnership with Hank and Brenda Klehn, on the Klehns’ 40-acre ranch located on a small mesa at the western end of the Santa Rita Hills. After discussing and planning the project for two years, they planted 7.75 acres in 1998 to three clones of Pinot Noir: Pommard, 115 and 667.

They named the vineyard Fe Ciega, Spanish for “Blind Faith.” The name is partly a tribute to a favorite band—Rick is a huge music lover, and there is a musical reference in another of his wines’ names (“Lovely Rita”). In 2008, they planted an additional 1.25 acres of Pinot Noir, Mount Eden clone, and three-quarters of an acre of Chardonnay.

I had a chance to try the very first vintage from Fe Ciega, the 2000, over lunch with Rick at Avant, a delightful tapas restaurant that co-occupies and shares a long glass wall with a custom crush facility in Buellton. Rick had salvaged a relatively small amount of grapes that year from the birds–they hadn’t yet installed netting–picking at only 22.4 brix. He aged the wine in neutral, 30 gallon barrels and only made 12 cases.

IMG_0745

The wine was a powerful beauty, with a great deal of complexity and a lot of life to it yet. At 13 years of age, it still had fruit, but has also taken on tertiary aromas and flavors, like mushroom, iodine and dried cherry. It also has a sweet green herb note to it that Rick believes is a signature of the vineyard. Rick himself confessed to being surprised as to how the wine had developed, especially at the sweetness and richness it had taken on with age which he hadn’t anticipated from tasting it in its youth.

Over the years, in addition to Pinot Noir and Chardonnay, Rick has also become a fan of Spanish varieties, like Albariño and Tempranillo, so has sought out the few vineyards containing those grapes in the Santa Barbara area. He also makes a Syrah and a Bordeaux blend, called Evidence.

In December 1998, Longoria was the very first to site his winery in the Lompoc industrial park now affectionately known as the “Lompoc Wine Ghetto.” Having planted Fe Ciega in the Santa Rita Hills, Rick was looking for someplace closer to bring the SRH grapes after harvest than all the way up to the wineries in Santa Ynez, where most of the available facilities were. Having gone to high school in Lompoc he was familiar with the area, and knew it was an inexpensive place to rent space. When he saw the Sobhani industrial park, he knew he’d found Longoria Wines’ new home.

This industrial park, together with another park owned by Steve Zotovich that recently opened next door, is now home to about 20 wineries. It’s sort of like a large campus devoted to the study and creation of wine, and Longoria is, for many there, its beloved dean and counselor.

IMG_0740
Longoria (right) with Zotovich winemaker Ryan Zotovich

Tasting through about a dozen of Rick’s wines at the winery reinforced my conclusions from many other tastings of Longoria over the years. These are very consistent, well made wines that are significantly lower in alcohol than most other wines from the region. Despite their lower alcohols, they typically have a lot of power and structure, giving them great aging potential.

For me, Rick’s most striking and successful wines are the Chardonnays and Pinot Noirs, especially those based on fruit from his Fe Ciega vineyard. The 2011 Lovely Rita Pinot, from Pommard clone vines at Fe Ciega, with relatively little new oak (20%), is a terrific value for high quality Cali Pinot Noir at $32. The 2011 Rita’s Crown Vineyard Chardonnay, his first vineyard designate Chard in 10 years, also stands out for its crystalline acidity and minerality, and its long finish. The Tempranillo is also a very good effort–one of the better domestic Tempranillos I’ve had, bringing to mind a delicious Rioja Crianza from a ripe year.

I’m also delighted by the fact that Rick doesn’t believe in using whole cluster, or grape stems, in his Pinots. For him, that’s a technique that “obscures the site expression and adds an element, like new oak.”

This is an intentionally small production operation at about 3,000 cases a year, so Rick can stay hands on and keep the quality high. The wines may therefore be harder to find outside of the California market, but they are well worth seeking out.

Rusack Vineyards is likewise a relatively small operation, with annual production at about 7,000 cases, aimed at making very high quality wines. Steven Gerbac was named winemaker there this year, after having worked his way up, starting in 2003, from production assistant, to cellar master and then to assistant winemaker under John Falcone, who has since moved over to direct winemaking at Gainey.

IMG_0717
Rusack’s Steven Gerbac

Prior to coming to Rusack, Gerbac had worked for both Whitcraft Winery and Brander Vineyard.

Rusack’s owners are Geoff Rusack, an aviation lawyer, and his wife Alison Wrigley Rusack, a Disney exec and descendant of the Wrigley chewing gum family, which also owned the Chicago Cubs and, through their purchase of the Santa Catalina Island Co. in 1919, all the developable land on Santa Catalina Island, which is located 22 miles off the coast of Los Angeles.

The two had long dreamed of starting a vineyard and winery, and purchased a 48-acre property in 1995 in Ballard Canyon that now has 17 planted vineyard acres.

This estate vineyard is planted primarily to Syrah and Sangiovese, with smaller blocks of Sauvignon Blanc, Semillon and Petite Sirah. They also grow one-half acre each of Cabernet Franc, Merlot and Petit Verdot, with meter by meter spacing, for their Bordeaux blend called Anacapa. The vineyard was substantially replanted in 2002-2003 with realigned rows, following the contours of the land and running 11 degrees off from a north-south direction, to allow for balanced sun exposure on both sides of the canopy.

The Rusacks also source grapes from other top growers in Ballard Canyon as well as, for their Pinot Noirs and Chardonnays, cool climate vineyards in Santa Rita Hills and Santa Maria Valley. This includes the Bien Nacido and Solomon Hills vineyards that I highlighted in my last blog piece on Santa Barbara County.

Having gained substantial experience in grape growing and winemaking in Santa Barbara County, the Rusacks turned in 2007 to a project they’d been thinking about since their first visit to Santa Catalina Island together in 1982, planting an “extreme” vineyard on Wrigley family land on the island’s southwestern coast.

The challenges here are many, including very saline soils and grape-loving foxes, quail and yellow jacket wasps.

They have so far planted 4.5 acres there–2.5 acres of Pinot Noir, 1.5 of Chardonnay and half an acre to a heritage clone of Zinfandel that Geoff Rusack obtained from nearby Santa Cruz Island.

It turns out that back in 1884, a San Francisco businessman named Justinian Caire also had dreams of an island vineyard. He built a red brick winery and planted vines on Santa Cruz Island off the coast of Santa Barbara, turning it into a very successful winery until Prohibition brought the business to an end in 1932.

David Dewey, ranch manager on Santa Cruz Island, located one of the last remaining vines on the island growing on a willow tree on a hillside. Rusack, with two of his sons, collected cuttings and had the vine identified as Zinfandel at U.C. Davis. He then took 200 cuttings for propagating into vines. Another last vine on the island was found to be the Mission grape, and Geoff Rusack has taken cuttings from that too, with the intention of ultimately planting a half acre plot of Mission vines from those cuttings in Ballard Canyon.

With help from an Australian soil scientist, Alfred Cass, who has expertise in planting on highly saline soils, the Rusacks planted their Catalina vineyard in two rows, side by side, on mounds. The mounds are used to double up the top soil and permit more salt drainage, with mist being sprayed on a regular basis to keep the salt moving downwards.

Steven Gerbac flies to the island once a week after veraison to monitor the progress of the vines. He told me that they are working to keep the foxes out by building a low voltage electric fence with advice from the island conservancy’s fox expert. They are also trying to redirect the foxes elsewhere using Calvin Klein’s Obsession, to which the foxes are highly attracted.

Steven explained that they have to fly workers from Santa Barbara to the island during harvest, and that they then fly the grapes, one ton at a time, from Catalina to Santa Ynez to make the wine at the Rusack winery in Ballard Canyon.

As you can imagine, the Catalina vineyard project currently has some of the highest production costs–if not the highest–of any vineyard in the country. The Rusacks plan to eventually build a winery and tasting room on the island, and could eventually expand the vineyard to 18 acres.

IMG_0715

Hearing this story about the Catalina Island project, I was dying to try the wines. They did not disappoint. The 2010 Chardonnay is quite complex, with highly unusual salty caramel aromas and flavors, along with more typical lemon, mineral and almond notes. The Pinot Noir also had very unusual, but appealing, aromas and flavors, including salty and dried cherries.

The best of the island wines of all, however, for me, was the Zinfandel from the Santa Cruz Island heritage clone. Steven only had one bottle left of this elixir, of which only a small amount had been made–half of the first crop was decimated by yellow jackets–and quickly sold out. I am so glad he ultimately decided to open this bottle for me, as I’ve never tasted a Zin quite like it. As Steven said, this was a Zin “made by a guy who makes a lot of Pinot.”

To start with, this wine is intensely aromatic, with dried currant, saline and iodine aromas. The palate includes salty dried plum, lavender bath salt and dried blueberry flavors. That may not sound like the most appetizing description, but believe me, this is a very tasty and unusual wine. It could also benefit from three years or so of additional bottle age.

I am very hopeful that they will plant more of this Zin and produce a lot more of this extraordinary wine. I think there should be a seminar devoted to it at an upcoming ZAP tasting.

Turning back to Rusack’s Santa Barbara-based wines, this is also a very strong lineup. I like everything they make, but am particularly a fan of their Anacapa Bordeaux blend, two of their Pinots–the 2011 Sta. Rita Hills Reserve and the 2011 Solomon Hills Vineyard, and both of their Syrahs. The 2011 Ballard Canyon Estate Syrah, which includes 9% Petite Sirah in the blend, is a particularly good value. I gave it 93+ points and it sells for only $25.

Like Longoria, Steve entirely destems his Pinot Noirs. As a strong advocate of destemming Pinot myself, I appreciated meeting two kindred spirits who happen to be great winemakers on this trip.

I was so excited by my visits with these and other Santa Barbara producers that I’ve returned for a couple more days this week, to taste with a few more recommended producers in this area. I hope to report soon on the results of those tastings, and of a special event at Sanford & Benedict I will be attending tomorrow.

For my tasting notes on all of the wines I sampled at both Longoria and Rusack, see below.

Longoria
IMG_0731

    • 2012 Longoria Albariño Clover Creek Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Ynez Valley (4/5/2013)
      Very light yellow color; appealing, tart peach, ripe pear nose; clean, rich, ripe pear, tart peach palate with good acidity; medium-plus finish 90+ points (90 points)

    • 2011 Longoria Chardonnay Cuvée Diana – USA, California, Central Coast, Sta. Rita Hills (4/5/2013)
      Light yellow color; appealing, white jasmine, ripe pear, vanilla nose; rich, round but balanced, ripe pear, ripe lemon, ripe grapefruit palate with vibrant acidity; medium-plus finish 91+ points (an acid lover’s treat at 3.07 pH; 13.7% alcohol; 13-14 mos in barrel, 30% new) (91 points)

    • 2011 Longoria Chardonnay Rita’s Crown – USA, California, Central Coast, Sta. Rita Hills (4/5/2013)
      Bright light yellow color; appealing, light hazelnut, almond nose; tasty, rich, hazelnut, ripe pear, lightly saline, mineral palate with crystalline acidity; long finish (Clone 96; 13.6% alcohol; Rick’s first vineyard designated Chardonnay in 10 years) (93 points)

    • 2011 Longoria Pinot Noir Bien Nacido Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/5/2013)
      Very dark cherry red color; appealing, sous bois, tea leaf, tart cranberry, rosehips nose; tasty, Pommard-like, tart cranberry, rosehips, sous bois, mineral palate with good acidity; could use 2-plus years; medium-plus finish 91+ points (13.6% alcohol) (91 points)

    • 2011 Longoria Pinot Noir Lovely Rita Sta. Rita Hills – USA, California, Central Coast, Sta. Rita Hills (4/5/2013)
      Medium dark ruby color; appealing, ripe cranberry, strawberry, light sous bois nose with a sense of salinity; delicious, well delineated, poised, ripe raspberry, strawberry palate with medium acidity; medium-plus finish (an elegant Cali Pinot for $32; 3.24 pH; 20% new oak) (93 points)

    • 2010 Longoria Pinot Noir Fe Ciega Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Sta. Rita Hills (4/5/2013)
      Very dark ruby color; appealing, tart cherry, dried cranberry, roses nose; tight, ripe cherry, baked raspberry palate with light salinity and roses on finish; needs 3 years; medium-plus finish 92+ points (13.9% alcohol; 30% new oak for 14 mos) (92 points)

    • 2011 Longoria Pinot Noir Block M Fe Ciega Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Sta. Rita Hills (4/5/2013)
      Saturated very dark ruby color; very appealing, tart cherry, ripe raspberry, roses nose; youthful, ripe and delicious cherry, ripe raspberry palate with fine tannins and good acidity; needs 2-3 years; long finish 93+ points (14.5% alcohol; 30% new oak for 14 mos) (93 points)

    • 2011 Longoria Pinot Noir La Encantada Vineyard Sta. Rita Hills – USA, California, Central Coast, Sta. Rita Hills (4/5/2013)
      Very dark ruby color; sous bois, forest floor, tree bark, light cinnamon nose; tight, powerful, complex, juicy, ripe cherry, orange oil, cinnamon, nutmeg palate; could use 2 years; medium-plus finish (13.6% alcohol) (93 points)

    • 2010 Longoria Syrah Alisos Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Barbara County (4/5/2013)
      Opaque purple red violet color; ripe, bright, cinnamon, plum nose; ripe but poised, ripe plum, cherry palate with bright fruit and good acidity; could use 2-3 years; medium-plus finish (22 mos in 25% new French oak) (91 points)

    • 2010 Longoria Tempranillo Santa Ynez Valley – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Ynez Valley (4/5/2013)
      Dark ruby color; baked berry, ripe red berry nose; youthful, plush, juicy, ripe red berry, cherry, vanilla palate reminiscent of a Rioja Crianza from a ripe year; medium-plus finish 90+ points (13.6% alcohol; 22 mos. in 33% new American oak; with 6-7% Merlot) (90 points)

    • 2010 Longoria Evidence – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Barbara County (4/5/2013)
      Saturated very dark ruby color; tart red currant, black currant, loamy nose; tasty, ripe red currant, cassis palate with firm sweet tannins and nice balance; good now but could use 2 years bottle age; medium-plus finish 90+ points (14.4% alcohol; 39% Cabernet Sauvignon, 36% Cabernet Franc, 20% Merlot, 5% Malbec) (90 points)

    • 2000 Longoria Pinot Noir Blind Faith Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/5/2013)
      From 375 ml – slightly cloudy dark cherry red color; mature, mushroom, iodine, ripe cranberry, dried cherry nose; tasty, mature, complex, ripe cherry, iodine, sweet green herb, dried cherry, mineral, mushroom, cinnamon palate with power, intensity and great acidity; medium-plus finish 93+ points (1st vintage from Fe Ciega Vineyard; picked at 22.4 brix to beat the birds from getting everything) (93 points)

    Rusack

    • 2012 Rusack Sauvignon Blanc – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Ynez Valley (4/4/2013)
      Very light yellow color; clean, tart grapefruit nose; precise, tasty, tart lime, saline, minerally palate with medium acidity; medium-plus finish (13.5% alcohol; stainless steel; no malolactic) (91 points)

    • 2011 Rusack Chardonnay – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Barbara County (4/4/2013)
      Bright light canary yellow color; appealing, white jasmine, tart pear nose; rich, tasty, ripe lemon, ripe pear, white jasmine palate; needs 1-plus year of bottle age; medium-plus finish (14.2% alcohol; barrel fermented with lees stirring) (91 points)

    • 2011 Rusack Chardonnay Reserve – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/4/2013)
      Bright light canary yellow color; appealing, tart pear, white jasmine, light vanilla nose; ripe, rich, vanilla, ripe lemon palate with density, balanced for a ripe style, with good acidity; medium-plus finish 91+ points (14.2% alcohol; pH 3.2; barrel selection of the best 12-20 barrels) (91 points)

    • 2010 Rusack Chardonnay SCIV Catalina – USA, California, Central Coast (4/4/2013)
      Light lemon yellow color; appealing, tart pear, salty caramel nose; tasty, unusual, ripe lemon, light salty caramel, mineral, almond palate with medium acidity; medium-plus finish 92+ points (clone 4; 14.2% alcohol) (92 points)

    • 2010 Rusack Pinot Noir SCIV Catalina – USA, California, Central Coast (4/4/2013)
      Dark ruby color; intriguing, roses, tart salty cherry, dried raspberry nose; tasty, unusual, intense, salty dried cherries, mineral, dried cranberry palate with medium acidity; needs 2 years of bottle age; medium-plus finish (14.2% alcohol; 3.7 pH; clones 4, 667 and 777) (91 points)

    • 2010 Rusack Pinot Noir – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Barbara County (4/4/2013)
      Very dark ruby color; appealing, aromatic, baked cherry, black raspberry, incense nose; rich, youthful, baked black cherry, black raspberry, spice palate with a touch of orange acidity; needs 2-3 years bottle age; medium-plus finish 91+ points (14.2% alcohol; 30-40% new oak) (91 points)

    • 2011 Rusack Pinot Noir Reserve – USA, California, Central Coast, Sta. Rita Hills (4/4/2013)
      Very dark ruby color; appealing, tart cherry, roses, loamy, earthy nose; delicious, rich, ripe raspberry, roses, tart cherry, ripe cranberry palate with good acidity and structure; could use 2-3 years of bottle age; medium-plus finish 93+ points (14.3% alcohol; 3.5 pH) (93 points)

    • 2011 Rusack Pinot Noir Solomon Hills Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/4/2013)
      Dark ruby color; roses, dried roses, dried cherry, saline, earthy nose; tasty, rich but poised, tart cherry, ripe cranberry, mineral, rosehips palate with density and good acidity; medium-plus finish 92+ points (14.3% alcohol; clones 667 and 777) (92 points)

    • 2010 Rusack Syrah Reserve Ballard Canyon – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Ynez Valley (4/4/2013)
      Very dark ruby color; green peppercorn, roasted plum nose; tasty, rich, dense, complex, tart plum, charcoal palate showing salinity and good acidity; medium-plus finish (92 points)

    • 2011 Rusack Syrah Ballard Canyon – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Ynez Valley (4/4/2013)
      Saturated, very dark ruby color; roasted black fruit, roasted meat, pepper, oregano nose; tight, dense, roasted black fruit, tart black fruit, savory, pepper, dried cured meat palate; medium-plus finish 93+ points (good value at about $25; with 9% Petite Sirah; 2% American oak) (93 points)

    • 2010 Rusack Sangiovese Ballard Canyon – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Ynez Valley (4/4/2013)
      Very dark ruby color; tart dried berry, charcoal nose; smoky oak, roasted tart black fruit, tart red berry palate with medium acidity; could use 2-3 years of bottle age; medium-plus finish (14.5% alcohol; 20% new oak) (89 points)

    • 2010 Rusack Anacapa – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Barbara County (4/4/2013)
      Saturated very dark red violet color; tart black currant, loam, fresh oregano nose; tight, tart black currant, loam, tart berry palate with a light sense of salinity and good acidity; needs 3-plus years of bottle age; medium-plus finish (14.7% alcohol; 46% Cabernet Franc; 27% Merlot, 27% Petit Verdot) (92 points)

    • 2010 Rusack Zinfandel SCIV Catalina – USA, California, Central Coast (4/4/2013)
      Dark ruby color; intense, lifted, aromatic, dried currant, saline, iodine, dried salt nose; unusual, intense, salty dried plum, lavender bath salt, dried blueberry palate with good acidity; could use 3 years of bottle age; medium-plus finish (from cuttings of Zin taken from Santa Cruz Island) (93 points)

    Santa Maria Valley: Low Profile, Cool Climate Excellence

    2013 May 3
    looking toward northern end of Santa Maria Valley from Bien Nacido

    looking toward northern end of Santa Maria Valley from Bien Nacido

    Santa Maria Valley is the country’s third oldest official wine appellation, producing distinctive, balanced, cool climate Chardonnay, Pinot Noir and Syrah. So why do marketing consultants advise producers here that they need to highlight Santa Barbara County and/or California on their labels? Because, sadly, the vast majority of consumers don’t know where Santa Maria Valley is or why it’s so special.

    This alluvial plain that was once an extensive bay extending inland from the ocean is bounded on two sides by mountains in one of the most geographically unusual orientations in all of North America. These mountains run east to west, unlike any other coastal mountains on the West Coast, not including Alaska. As a result, they funnel in a steady stream of cold ocean air from the Santa Barbara coast.

    Thanks to this funnel effect, the region is typically blanketed with ocean fog all evening through mid-morning, and the temperature averages a mild 64 degrees. The growing season, an average of 125 days, is longer than pretty much anywhere in the nation. As a result, grapes that like it cool—the Burgundy varieties Chardonnay and Pinot Noir, and the Rhone variety Syrah—can really excel here, slowly developing complex flavors and retaining great natural acidity. The ocean air influence also seems to impart a sense of salinity to many of the wines, much like the ocean breezes do in nearby Santa Rita Hills. That makes these wines a little more savory than their counterparts from elsewhere and delightful for pairing with food.

    The vineyards here are planted on hillsides, elevated plateaus or along the river benches of the Santa Maria and Sisquoc Rivers. The soils range from clay loam to sandy loam, with good drainage. Rainfall generally averages only about 14 inches annually—and it’s been significantly less than that for the last couple of years. Yields also tend to be low due to cool Spring temperatures, which affect fruit set, causing the vines to produce fewer clusters with greater flavor intensity.

    Viticulturalist Jim Stollberg with 40-year-old vines at Riverbench

    Viticulturalist Jim Stollberg with 40-year-old vines at Riverbench

    So why aren’t the wines of this appellation better known? I think it has a lot to do with the fact that the vast majority of vineyard acreage here has long been owned by just a handful of companies, who originally planted and sold their crop mainly to well known producers in Northern California. That includes Kendall-Jackson’s 1500-acre Cambria Vineyard, the 950-acre North Canyon Vineyard long a source for Beringer, and the giant White Hills Vineyard, recently sold to a large Midwestern agricultural group.

    One very large vineyard that has, by contrast, done a lot to raise the visibility and quality standards of this region is the justly famous Bien Nacido Vineyards.

    Bien Nacido

    In 1969, brothers Stephen and Robert Miller, the fourth generation of a California farming family, purchased two neighboring parcels totaling over 2,000 acres that were once part of the Rancho Tepesquet Mexican land grant. They began planting grapes there in 1973 with the help of pioneering area grape grower Dale Hampton.

    In an unusual move, the first 300 acres were planted entirely with certified virus free increase block from U.C. Davis rather than the more typical planting with cuttings from other vineyards. These vines were also planted on their own rootstock. Most of the initial plantings were Pommard and Martini clones of Pinot, and clone 4 of Chardonnay. Trial plantings of Bordeaux varieties did not perform so well in this cool climate, so those were soon grafted over to Chardonnay and Pinot. There was also some Riesling and Gewurztraminer planted early on, which reportedly made some great wine, but for which there proved to be no market. Those vines have since been grafted over as well.

    Even the market for Pinot Noir was very weak in the vineyard’s early years. The Millers sold a lot of their Chardonnay in the late ‘70s to sparkling wine producers in the north, insisting that they take some Pinot Noir along with the Chardonnay they were buying.

    The Miller Family, owners of Bien Nacido and Solomon Hills vineyards

    The Miller Family, owners of Bien Nacido and Solomon Hills vineyards

    Jim Clendenen of Au Bon Climat was an early purchaser of the Millers’ Chardonnay and Pinot Noir grapes, and based on the quality of his wines, the Millers agreed to allow him to use Bien Nacido as a vineyard designation. They also ultimately let him build his utilitarian winemaking facility, which houses both Au Bon Climat and Bob Lindquist’s Qupé, on property toward the northwestern end of Bien Nacido. Now grapes from about one-third of the vineyard—largely from blocks grown on slopes and hillsides, and older vineyard sections—are deemed eligible for vineyard designation, with the approval of the Millers.

    Bien Nacido was the first cool climate vineyard in California in which Syrah was planted, at the urging of Bob Lindquist. He’s made excellent Syrah from these plantings for Qupé, and wrote a technical paper on cool climate Syrah that got the attention of other cool climate growers.

    Bien Nacido is also renowned for planting custom blocks on behalf of a number of highly respected producers. This has included blocks for Sine Qua Non’s Manfred Krankl, hillside Syrah plantings for Maggie Harrison of Lillian, a block of nine different Pinot Noir clones for Foxen, and biodynamically cultivated plots for both Qupé and Bonny Doon. Bien Nacido grapes are sold to these customers not by the ton, as is the case for most growers, but by charging a flat rate for a particular area or rows, so the winemaker is free to crop the vines to whatever level they wish.

    Bien Nacido now encompasses about 800 planted vineyard acres, and the nearby Solomon Hills Vineyards, which the Millers planted in 1999, contain another 100 acres of vines.

    Winemaker Trey Fletcher and Vineyard Manager Chris Hammell at Bien Nacido

    Winemaker Trey Fletcher and Vineyard Manager Chris Hammel at Bien Nacido

    I toured Bien Nacido with Vineyard Manager Chris Hammell during my trip last month to Santa Barbara County. The tour amounted to a graphic history lesson on the development of California vineyard management over the past four decades.

    This included the valley floor plantings of virus free increase stock with their solid steel posts; a hillside “amphitheater” of southwest facing Roussanne, clone 174 Syrah and Mount Eden selection Chardonnay; and blocks of Pinot Blanc—another cool climate loving grape that, despite performing quite well in this area, are being grafted over to Pinot Noir due to lack of demand.

    Chris told me that the old vine Martini clone Pinot Noir, dating back to 1973, is in particularly high demand amongst buyers these days. There are about 20 acres of these grapes in Block N, and another eight or so in Block Q. Although this clone was disparaged in decades past as being the main culprit behind the herbaceous flavors sometimes found in Santa Maria Valley Pinot, the old vines have proven to be very drought and heat resistant, and to produce low, flavorful yields. The Martini also ripens at lower brix, resulting in lower alcohol levels, than the Dijon clones and Pommard.

    Chris also showed me new plantings of Grenache he’s quite excited about–both Alban clone and Garnacha Tinta from Spain–in a sheltered, warmer area of the vineyard. The vineyard is also home to roughly 100 sheep and goats, a few donkeys and two dogs.

    Besides wine grapes, about 10% of the vineyard area is devoted to other crops like avocados, Meyer lemons and blueberries. These crops and the different schedules at which they develop and ripen help the Millers keep a year-round labor force in place.

    Bien Nacido blueberries

    Bien Nacido blueberries (l to r: Spring High, Sapphire, Jewel)

    The blueberries, by the way, are quite delicious. I got to sample three of the four varieties they grow—Jewel, Sapphire and Spring High–which are distributed by Driscoll’s (Bien Nacido and Oxnard are the first places in California where blueberries ripen in the Spring). Each variety is packed separately, although they’re not marketed by Driscoll under their variety names (apparently only in England can you buy particular varieties of blueberries).

    The stewards of this admirably managed vineyard, the Millers, established Central Coast Wine Services in the late 1980s as a custom crush facility. The availability of this resource has helped incubate new wineries, as well as increase the local demand for Bien Nacido fruit. They more recently opened a similar operation in Paso Robles, where they also own the extensive French Camp Vineyards .

    The latest vinous development for the Miller family is the production of small quantities of wine from their Santa Maria Valley vineyards under their own Bien Nacido and Solomon Hills Vineyard labels.

    Initially Steve’s son Nicholas, who is the enterprise’s VP of sales and marketing (brother Marshall is on the operations and finance side of the business), made this wine working with consultants. In 2011, they hired Trey Fletcher, then assistant winemaker at Littorai and previously assistant winemaker at Domaine Alfred, to head the winemaking for both the Bien Nacido and Solomon Hills labels.

    I got to taste through the latest releases under those labels with Trey in the project’s aluminum sided winemaking facility. These are delicious wines with vibrant acidity that will add further luster to Bien Nacido’s already excellent reputation. The 2010 Bien Nacido Chardonnay and 2009 Solomon Hills Pinot Noir are particularly strong, while the 2009 Bien Nacido Syrah is an absolutely delicious and peppery cool climate Syrah.

    Another reason for this appellation’s relatively low profile with consumers is that the area has been devoted much more to viticulture than to tourism. Until recently there were relatively few tasting rooms or facilities devoted to tourists here. That is changing in a dramatic way this year with a massive new winery, cave and visitor’s complex about to be completed at Presqu’ile.

    Presqu’ile

    Presqu’ile is the project of Matt Murphy and his family. The Murphys hail from Arkansas, where their Gulf Coast family compound, called Presqu’ile after the Creole phrase meaning “almost an island,” was essentially destroyed by Hurricane Katrina.

    Presqu'ile's Matt Murphy

    Presqu’ile’s Matt Murphy

    Matt’s father and grandfather originally made money in the oil business. Matt had worked summers in Napa at Signorello starting in 2004, and moved to California in 2006. The family had been involved in wine ventures through partnerships, including the now basically defunct Ambullneo Winery (succeeded by Greg Linn Wines) where Matt met South African Dieter Cronje. Dieter became Matt’s best friend and the winemaker for Presqu’ile when that project began with the purchase of 173 acres on a hill in the cool southern end of Santa Maria Valley in 2007.

    They have so far planted 65 of the 173 acres at Presqu’ile, and purchased an additional 10.5 acres of Pinot Noir planted in 2001 that lay adjacent to the property.

    The land here was previously occupied by a gladiola bulb and cut-flower farm. Working with vineyard manager Jim Stollberg, Matt and Dieter planned the vineyards to ensure each grape variety was planted in multiple locations, row directions and spacing, with multiple clones and rootstocks. Both Matt and Dieter are Burgundy collectors and fanatics, so the plantings are primarily Chardonnay and Pinot Noir, along with some Sauvignon Blanc, Syrah and an acre of Matt’s next favorite grape after Pinot Noir, Nebbiolo. They have also made wine from purchased grapes, including grapes sourced from the Bien Nacido and Solomon Hills vineyards.

    Presqu'ile winemaker Dieter Conje with La Fenêtre owner/winemaker Josh Klapper

    Presqu’ile winemaker Dieter Conje with La Fenêtre owner/winemaker Josh Klapper

    Their first commercial vintage was 2009. I got to taste wines from both the 2010 and 2011 vintages, and I think it’s clear they’ve been quick learners, as I found the 2011 bottlings were all superior to their 2010 counterparts. The standouts for me were the 2011 Chardonnay from their first harvest of the new plantings and the 2011 Sauvignon Blanc, both relatively good values at $35 and $22 respectively. The Pinot Noirs, which have substantial whole cluster inclusion (Matt and Dieter are big fans of Burgundy’s Dujac, which is heavy on stem inclusion) have a lot of stemmy tannins that will need a few years of bottle age to integrate.

    The new winery and visitor complex, which was still under construction when I visited and which is scheduled for a June 20 opening, is breathtaking. There’s truly nothing else like it in the appellation.

    Riverbench

    Riverbench is another longtime Santa Maria vineyard source that has more recently gotten into the winemaking business since the vineyard was purchased in 2004 by a group of local families. One can also now visit and taste the wines in their Santa Maria Valley tasting room, open daily in a newly restored Craftsman style house, or at their brand new tasting room in Santa Barbara’s trendy Funk Zone.

    The Riverbench Vineyard, where 260 acres are now planted, includes 120 acres of old vines planted in 1973—50 acres of Martini clone Pinot Noir and 70 of Chardonnay. New plantings of Pinot Noir, Pinot Gris and Viognier were added in 2007.

    Chuck Ortmann of Meridian was the original winemaker, starting with the 2006 vintage. After Chuck announced his retirement in 2011, Clarissa Nagy, formerly assistant winemaker at Longoria and the Bonnacorsi winemaker since 2006, came on board as winemaker. The vineyard manager since 2006 is the same Jim Stollberg who is also vineyard manager at Presqu’ile.

    I particularly liked the Riverbench unoaked 2011 Bedrock Chardonnay and the 2010 Mesa Pinot Noir, from a block of own-rooted Martini clone planted in 1973. They also make a small quantity of very respectable sparkling wine.

    With the new developments at these three Santa Maria producers, I expect the appellation’s profile will soon be rising. Savvy wine buyers already know that Bien Nacido on the label is a signal that the wine inside is bound to be good. Other producers who are making wonderful wines highly worthy of consumers’ attention from grapes grown in this region include Chanin, Foxen, La Fenêtre, Paul Lato, Summerland and Tyler.

    For my tasting notes on all the wines I tasted from these producers, along with notes on current releases from other producers based on Bien Nacido grapes, see below.

    Bien Nacido Vineyards
    Bien Nacido Syrah

    • 2010 Solomon Hills Chardonnay – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Barbara County (4/2/2013)
      Light yellow color; appealing, tart pear, white jasmine nose; tasty, tart pear, mineral palate with good acidity; medium-plus finish (13.9% alcohol; 33% new oak) 91 points
    • 2010 Bien Nacido Vineyards Chardonnay – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/2/2013)
      Light yellow color; ripe pear, light poached pear, butter poached pear nose; tasty, light-medium bodied, light footed, tart pear, mineral palate with light salinity and vibrant acidity; medium-plus finish 92+ points (14.1% alcohol; 60% new French oak; all from Bien Nacido’s Block W planted to clone 4; ideal pairing with oysters, scallops, calamari) 92 points
    • 2009 Solomon Hills Pinot Noir Solomon Hills Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/2/2013)
      Dark black-tinged red violet color; appealing, tart cherry, saline, floral, light sandalwood nose; youthful, tight, tart black cherry, light sandalwood, spice palate with good acidity; could use 2-plus years for development; medium-plus finish (30% new oak; 16 mos on lees; about 1//3 each Pommard, 115 and 667 clones) 92 points
    • 2009 Bien Nacido Vineyards Pinot Noir Santa Maria Valley – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/2/2013)
      Black-tinged medium dark red violet color; dried roses, tart cherry, cranberry nose; tasty, tart cranberry, tart cherry, rosehips palate with medium acidity, grip and character; could use 1-2 years; medium-plus finish (14.1% alcohol; old vine Pommard from Q Block, with small amounts from Block G and Block 40) 91+ points
    • 2009 Bien Nacido Vineyards Syrah Santa Maria Valley – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/2/2013)
      Opaque black red violet color; appealing, lifted, roasted black fruit, black and white pepper,charcoal nose; tight, tasty, tart roasted black fruit, black and white pepper, mineral palate with purity and salinity; needs 3 years; medium-plus finish (14.5% alcohol; from Block Z, with about 5% interplanted Viognier, planted in late 1980s) 93+ points

    Presqu’ile
    Presqu'ile wines

    • 2011 Presqu’ile Sauvignon Blanc – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Barbara County (4/1/2013)
      Light yellow color; appealing, smoky, lemon grass, tart gooseberry nose; firm textured, tart gooseberry, tart citrus palate with medium acidity; medium-plus finish (60% malo; 6-7 mos on lees) 91+ points
    • 2011 Presqu’ile Chardonnay – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/1/2013)
      Light yellow color with lots of small SO2 bubbles; appealing, ripe pear, butter poached pear nose; tart apple, butter poached pear, mineral palate with good density and acidity; medium-plus finish (18 mos in neutral oak) 92 points
    • 2010 Presqu’ile Chardonnay – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/1/2013)
      Light yellow color; leesy, tart lemon, ripe pear nose; round, rich, creamy textured, ripe lemon, almond palate; medium finish (10% new oak) 90+ points
    • 2011 Presqu’ile Pinot Noir – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/1/2013)
      Dark cherry red color; lovely tart cherry, tart cranberry, sous bois nose; tasty, balanced, tart cranberry, mineral, sous bois, saline palate with medium acidity; ready now; medium-plus finish (60% whole cluster) 91+ points
    • 2010 Presqu’ile Pinot Noir – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/1/2013)
      Very dark cherry red color; tart berry, roasted plum, green pepper nose; soft mouthfeel, tart cranberry, sour cherry, green bean palate; medium finish (25% new oak) 90 points
    • 2010 Presqu’ile Pinot Noir Rimrock Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/1/2013)
      Pre-release (Fall ’13 release) – Very dark cherry red color; tart cranberry, sous bois, charcoal, sage nose; savory, textured, tart cranberry, roasted currant, sous bois, charcoal palate with medium acidity and firm tannins; needs 2-3 years; medium-plus finish (100% whole cluster; clones 667 and 115) 91 points
    • 2010 Presqu’ile Pinot Noir Presqu’ile Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/1/2013)
      Dark red violet color; tart cranberry, roasted plum, dried berry nose; tasty, tart berry, dried berry, tart currant, light olive tapenade palate with firm tannins; needs 4-5 years; medium-plus finish (100% whole cluster; 18 mos in 30% new oak) 90+ points

    Riverbench
    Riverbench wines

    • 2010 Riverbench Vineyard & Winery Chardonnay Cork Jumper Blanc de Blancs Riverbench – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/2/2013)
      Light yellow color with speedy column of very tiny bubbles; lemon powder, tart apple, lime, tart pear nose; bright, tart pear, fresh cut lime, mineral, chalk palate with tangy acidity; medium-plus finish (12.5% alcohol) 89+ points
    • 2011 Riverbench Vineyard & Winery Chardonnay Bedrock Riverbench Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/2/2013)
      Bright canary yellow color; fresh, tart lemon, tart pear, honeysuckle nose; focused, clean, ripe lemon, tart pear, lightly saline palate with bright acidity; medium-plus finish (14.2% alcohol; stainless steel, 90% malolactic; 3.5 pH; great pairing with grilled shrimp or burrata) 91 points
    • 2010 Riverbench Vineyard & Winery Chardonnay Estate – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/2/2013)
      Light lemon yellow color; tart guava, green apple, pineapple nose; rich but poised, rounded, tart pineapple, ripe pear palate; medium finish (14.5% alcohol; 11 mos in French oak, 55% 1 year old; good pairing with white cream cheeses or lobster pot pie) 89 points
    • 2010 Riverbench Vineyard & Winery Pinot Noir Estate – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/2/2013)
      Very dark cherry red color; ripe raspberry, tart cherry, rhubarb nose; tasty, sappy, tart cherry, ripe raspberry, berry jam palate; richly flavored but balanced with a dusting of milk chocolate; medium-plus finish (14.6% alcohol; mainly vines planted in 1973) 91 points
    • 2010 Riverbench Vineyard & Winery Pinot Noir The Mesa Riverbench Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/2/2013)
      Dark red violet color; deep, black cherry, black raspberry, tart berry nose; rich, tasty, black fruit, black cherry, black raspberry, tart berry syrup palate; medium-plus finish (14.5% alcohol; 9 mos in oak, 7% new, 60% 1-yr-old; all own-rooted Martini clone) 92 points

    Other Producers’ Bien Nacido Designate Wines

    Gavin Chanin

    Gavin Chanin

    • 2010 Anglim Viognier Bien Nacido Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (3/25/2012)
      Very light green-tinged yellow color; tart pear, floral nose; tasty, tart pear, floral palate; medium-plus finish (very good Viognier) 91+ points
    • 2009 Au Bon Climat Chardonnay Historic Vineyards Collection Bien Nacido Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Barbara County (4/6/2013)
      Light yellow color; appealing, butter poached pear, saline nose; tasty, tight, tart pear, mineral, saline, iodine, light hazelnut palate with good acidity; needs 2-3 years; medium-plus finish 92+ points
    • 2010 Chanin Chardonnay Bien Nacido Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (2/4/2013)
      Light lemon yellow color with 1 millimeter clear meniscus; ripe pear, ripe lemon, pineapple, French oak nose; French oak on entry that should integrate in two years or so, tart pear, tart lemon, mineral, ripe grapefruit palate with medium acidity; needs 2 years; medium-plus finish (13.9% alcohol) 92+ points
    • 2011 Chanin Chardonnay Bien Nacido Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (2/4/2013)
      Light canary yellow color; tart lemon, vanilla, lemon drop nose; tasty, rich, lemon drop, tart lemon palate; medium-plus finish 92+ points
    • 2011 Chanin Pinot Noir Bien Nacido Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (2/4/2013)
      Medium cherry red color; sous bois, rosehips nose; sous bois, rosehips, mineral palate with nice texture, balance and medium acidity; needs 3 years to fully integrate; medium-plus finish 92 points
    • 2011 Foxen Chardonnay Block UU Bien Nacido – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/2/2013)
      Light yellow color; butter, poached pear, butter sauce nose; juicy, ripe pear, tart apricot palate with a sense of salinity and good acidity; medium-plus finish 91 points
    • 2010 Foxen Pinot Noir Block 8 Bien Nacido Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/2/2013)
      Very dark ruby color; appealing, ripe black cherry, black raspberry, boysenberry, lifted nose; very appealing, tart black cherry, black raspberry palate with a sense of salinity; medium-plus finish 91+ points
    • 2010 La Fenêtre Chardonnay Bien Nacido Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/1/2013)
      Light medium yellow color; golden delicious apple, tart pear nose; rich, ripe apple, pear, ripe lime palate with good, balancing acidity; medium-plus finish (14.5% alcohol; 18 mos in 25% new oak) 91 points
    • 2010 La Fenêtre Pinot Noir Old Vines Bien Nacido – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/1/2013)
      Dark cherry red color; ripe cherry, baked cherry, baked raspberry nose; tasty, balanced, rich, tart cherry, strawberry jam, ripe raspberry palate with good acidity; could use 2-plus years; medium-plus finish 92 points
    • 2009 Paul Lato Syrah Il Padrino Bien Nacido Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/28/2012)
      Very dark purple red violet color; aromatic, charcoal, tart black fruit, blueberry nose; complex, charcoal, tart black fruit, blueberry palate; medium-plus finish 93 points
    • 2010 Paul Lato Syrah Il Padrino Bien Nacido Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/28/2012)
      Dark ruby color; lifted, tart black fruit, ripe black fruit, pepper, graphite nose; tasty, intense, tart black fruit, pepper, violets, mineral palate; needs 3 years; long finish 93+ points
    • 2010 Qupé Chardonnay Y Block Bien Nacido Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/9/2012)
      Light yellow color; focused, tart pear, poached pear nose; tasty, poached pear, tart pear, tart pineapple palate; medium-plus finish 91 points
    • 2009 Qupé Syrah Bien Nacido Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (3/25/2012)
      Dark ruby color; roasted black fruit, smoke, savory nose; tasty, tart black fruit, roasted plum, mineral, light pepper palate; medium-plus finish 92 points
    • 2009 Summerland Pinot Noir Bien Nacido Vineyard Block T – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/2/2013)
      Medium dark cherry red color; appealing, tart cherry, tart raspberry, floral nose; tasty, tart cherry, tart raspberry, light spice, light sandalwood palate with good acidity; medium-plus finish (Martini and Pommard clone) 91 points
    • 2009 Summerland Pinot Noir Proprietors Reserve Bien Nacido Vineyards – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (4/2/2013)
      Dark cherry red color; roses, ripe cherry, berry syrup nose; tasty, tart cherry, tart raspberry, saline, roses, mineral palate with near medium acidity; medium-plus finish 92+ points
    • 2010 Twomey Pinot Noir Bien Nacido Vineyard Santa Maria Valley – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (11/11/2012)
      Very dark ruby color; rich, ripe cherry, ripe berry nose; tasty, tart cherry, tart berry, ripe raspberry palate; medium-plus finish (13.5% alcohol; sample provided by winery) 91+ points
    • 2010 Tyler Chardonnay Bien Nacido – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (2/4/2013)
      Lightly cloudy lemon yellow color; poached pear, hazelnut nose; tasty, rich, ripe pear, ripe lemon, pear cream, mineral palate with good acidity; medium-plus finish (from block planted in 1973) 93 points
    • 2010 Tyler Pinot Noir Q Block Bien Nacido Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (3/19/2012)
      Medium dark cherry red color; focused, appealing, tart cherry, roses, rosehips nose; tasty, tart cherry, mineral, rosehips palate with good acidity; medium-plus finish 93+ points
    • 2010 Tyler Pinot Noir N Block Bien Nacido Vineyard – USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley (2/4/2013)
      Dark ruby color; appealing, ripe cherry, ripe raspberry, rose petals nose; lighter in structure than Tyler’s other 2010 Pinots, ripe cherry, ripe raspberry, rose petals, mineral, sous bois palate; medium-plus finish (13.7% alcohol) 92+ points

    ViperProof by ViperChill